LIPITOR

© MMXIX V.1.0.2
by Morley Evans

LIPITOR®

Pfizer and the doctors made lots of $$MONEY selling this garbage. Along with Zocor®, Lipitor® took TWENTY YEARS out to my life, including the twelve years it took to recover. Lipiturd and Zocor

https://twitter.com/MaryanneDemasi/status/1192382777187897345

I have a slam-dunk legal case that doesn't even require an "expert witness." Can doctors not read? No, doctors can't read or they don't bother to read or they don't understand what they have read or they can read and they deliberately prescribe drugs that they know are harming their patients. Those are the only possible choices in my case. In my experience, doctors don't know anything about the drugs they prescribe. They just write prescriptions holus-bolus. They don't have to know anything. Canada has stupid unsupervised doctors. Anything goes! Doctors are an undifferentiated class because doctors defend their brethren regardless of what they do. Doctors stick together through thick and thin. Patients are damned as mere income opportunities.

Unfortunately, Canada doesn't have justice either. It has doctor-protection. If Canada had a justice system, I would be set for life, along with my descendants who would be wealthy for generations like Rockefellers and Kennedys. Millions of Canadians who have been harmed by doctors and the garbage they prescribe would have all the money doctors and their pharmaceutical masters have squirrelled away. A massive transfer of wealth would occur and Canadian taxpayers would be relieved of the crushing burden of Medicare. Lawyers who have protected doctors would need to look for other work. They could dig ditches or shovel snow. In winter, Canada has lots of snow. In summer, Canada has mud. Some lawyers and judges would go to the iron hotel. 

Canadians would finally get quality healthcare and better health. Goodbye, Tommy Douglas, you Commie-pinko jackass.

MORE ON STATINS

A CRYING NEED

© MMXIX V.1.0.4
by Morley Evans

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA.

Dear Folks,

Linked below is a PDF file to Voices from Syria. You may find it hard to read. Cognitive dissonance may start blocking what you read. Many thanks to the author Mark Taliano.

The bad news, generally, is that reality has been reversed for most people. That is because the information they receive has been reversed. What they believe is false and what they don’t believe is true. The good guys are the bad guys and the bad guys are the good guys. Unless you specialize in looking under the rocks, and holding your nose, what you believe will have been inverted like everyone else's opinions.

"Trump distemper" has been created by years of non-stop anti-Trump propaganda in the NYTimes, CNN, CNBC, Washington Post, the CBA, BBC, et al. People infected with Trump distemper manage to turn every conversation about anything into an anti-Trump diatribe after a few sentences. It is the best evidence that propaganda works and mass minds control has been achieved. It isn't perfect yet because, despite all efforts made by the Deep State, Trump is the President. Tough nuts.

Broadly speaking, the media is where we get our information about the world. The media includes newspapers, magazines, TV, movies, textbooks, popular books, word-of-mouth hearsay and rumours. This content has been integrated. Information that disagrees with the intended message is redacted. How is this possible? The concentration of ownership is one important feature of the information system we have. The piper plays what the master wants to hear. Alternative media will only temporarily provide the truth. That will end when the Empire has figured out how to better control the Internet. The U.S. military (DARPA) created the Internet. They made it invulnerable so the U.S. command and control system would survive a nuclear attack. They had no idea how it would be used.

Newspapers not long ago printed information that disagreed with Imperial messages. That has been overcome. Most newspapers now are owned by a handful of people. The Agency controls what the presstitutes write. A leading journalist in Germany self-published a book in which he disclosed that he and most journalists in Europe are paid by the CIA. Not only did they pay him, but they also gave him articles that had been written by CIA staffers for him to sign. He died under mysterious circumstances. (Udo Ulfkotte (20 January 1960 – 13 January 2017) was a German journalist who maintained that journalists (including himself) and leading newspapers published material that had been fed to them, or bought, by the CIA and other Western intelligence and propaganda agencies. You can buy his book on Amazon.) More on this from Paul Craig Roberts. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/11/paul-craig-roberts/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-free-press/

Voices from Syria was written by Mark Taliano. I recommend you buy his book. You can get it at www.globalresearch.com.  Or you can download it FREE here. 

I recommend you read everything that was written by William Blum. Bill died last year. Bill coined the phrase, “Freeing the World to Death”. You can start with his book by that title. Bill's body was found in his apartment. Bill had been dead for a few days. The cause of death was determined to be a fall. Really? Bill had broken ribs and bruises consistent with being beaten to death. Bill was ninety-something. It wouldn’t have taken much to kill him. Bill had been a State Department staffer until, one day during the War in Vietnam, he had seen enough. He opened his eyes and started writing. Noam Chomsky recommends Bill as THE expert on U.S. foreign affairs after 1945. 

Edward Snowden used to work for the NSA. He absconded to Russia where he is safe. Julian Assange and Bradly/Chelsea Manning should have gone to Russia where they would be protected by the evil Putin who has nuclear weapons and knows how to use them.

What does this mean for the Anglican Church of Canada? “Conspiracy Theories” won’t fill the pews. That very term was coined by the CIA to dismiss anyone who disagreed with the Warren Commission report. Hundreds have disagreed with it. I do. You should read their books. You can find them with Google. Search for "JFK Assassination conspiracy theory". You'll find dozens if you look. Many of the authors have been snuffed but their works live on proving the pen is mightier than the sword. Without a shadow of a doubt, the JFK assassination was a coup d'état. LBJ was its Chief Executive Officer and chief beneficiary.

Millions of people are being displaced and killed, right now. You can read Margaret Griffis at www.AntiWar.com.  Margaret keeps track of the hundreds of people killed in Iraq each month. Don't take your vacation in Iraq. The Anglican Church of Canada should at least be aware of these crimes. It might decry what’s going on, but opinion leaders should at least know about them.

A humongous evil is rising among us. Religious leaders used to be thought leaders. They have lost their position. No one listens to them anymore. The pews are empty. People like Pastor John Hagee, in Houston, are doing fine, though. He has bags of money. His pews are full. He is a third-generation Bible-puncher. He has a national mega-church. Why? Do lies sell better than truth? Hagee is a “Christian Zionist”. His flock elects like-minded people to Congress. “Israel” takes them to the Holy Land where they can visit the Holy Sites that “Israel” hasn’t demolished yet and where Hagee can lecture them on “End Times prophesy”. U.S. Congressmen send money and weapons to “Israel”. They give the Israeli Prime Minister non-stop standing ovations when he comes to address the United States Congress. Money and power buy Congressional love.

The United States supports the State of Israel which is the Zionist project on the Mediterranean. Everything “Israel” does and has done is ILLEGAL. Zionists are criminals. Every synagogue in the world has always had the Decalogue nailed to a wall. Zionists break every Commandment. Zionists are atheists. Zionism and its racist-paranoiac ideology are well-established as part of the élite in every country, including Canada. Zionism is a disease that has infected everyone. Zionism has nothing to do with Jews or their religion. Zionism is the opposite of Judaism.

Along with Zionism, the United States and its vassals support Saudi Arabia which uses much of its billions in oil revenues to promote Wahhabism around the world and to finance jihadis who chop heads and destroy unbelievers and their history. Beginning with oil riches discovered in 1950, Wahhabi wild men have risen up in the Arabian Desert to attack and destroy the birthplace of man, the Levant and Mesopotamia. They chop heads of Christians, Jews, along with Shia and Suni Muslims who lived peacefully together for centuries in the Ottoman empire.

U.S. weapons manufacturers make billions to make the world a dangerous place. American foreign policy is a past master of turning brother against brother and sowing discord, hatred, and violence while it pretends to be spreading Liberation, Human Rights and Democracy. The U.S. military provides a solid career path to riches for some. The American military-industrial complex sheds crocodile tears while it banks billions.  

The underclass of the world continues to be crushed. The Yemeni are being slaughtered by MbS with Canadian help. Canada isn't really the nice place everyone thinks it is. I'll leave that for later. Who cares about Yemen? Most Canadians could not find Yemen on a map. Canadians are smug about their righteousness. A catharsis is needed. Mark Taliano the author of Voices from Syria is a Canadian. He may light the fuse. Read his book.

Oh, what'll you do now, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, what'll you do now, my darling young one?
I'm a-goin' back out 'fore the rain starts a-fallin'
I'll walk to the depths of the deepest black forest
Where the people are many and their hands are all empty
Where the pellets of poison are flooding their waters
Where the home in the valley meets the damp dirty prison
Where the executioner's face is always well-hidden
Where hunger is ugly, where souls are forgotten
Where black is the color, where none is the number
And I'll tell it and think it and speak it and breathe it
And reflect it from the mountain so all souls can see it
Then I'll stand on the ocean until I start sinkin'
But I'll know my song well before I start singin'
And it's a hard, it's a hard, it's a hard, it's a hard
It's a hard rain's a-gonna fall.
- Bob Dylan

There is a whole lot to do. This essay doesn't even include Modern Medicine which is totally corrupt. EVIL IS RISING. The Anglican Church of Canada should get started. It's your job.

Thank you for your time. If you want to fire me, you can.

Sincerely,
Morley Evans

DEMOCRATS

© MMXIX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Paul Craig Roberts summed it up with this.

Why aren’t the Democrats complaining about the criminally illegal treatment of Julian Assange and Manning? The reason is that the Democrats, the most utterly corrupt political organization on the face of the Earth, are bought and paid for by the Deep State. The Democrats are dog excrement to the core. They are traitors to America and to our Constitutional order. The entire party should be arrested and put on trial for sedition to overthrow the government of the United States.

In fact, Democrats — the jackass Party — are responsible for much wrongdoing.

SWEDISH GIRL RESPONDS

© MMXIX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

AL-ASSAD INTERVIEW

© MMXIX V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52481.htm

ASSANGE IN COURT

© MMXIX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Assange in Court: What I Saw
by Craig Murray Posted on October 23, 2019

Julian Assange

I was deeply shaken while witnessing yesterday’s events in Westminster Magistrates Court. Every decision was railroaded through over the scarcely heard arguments and objections of Assange’s legal team, by a magistrate who barely pretended to be listening.

Before I get on to the blatant lack of fair process, the first thing I must note was Julian’s condition. I was badly shocked by just how much weight my friend has lost, by the speed his hair has receded and by the appearance of premature and vastly accelerated ageing. He has a pronounced limp I have never seen before. Since his arrest, he has lost over 15 kg (33 pounds) in weight.

But his physical appearance was not as shocking as his mental deterioration. When asked to give his name and date of birth, he struggled visibly over several seconds to recall both. I will come to the important content of his statement at the end of proceedings in due course, but his difficulty in making it was very evident; it was a real struggle for him to articulate the words and focus his train of thought.

Until yesterday I had always been quietly sceptical of those who claimed that Julian’s treatment amounted to torture – even of Nils Melzer, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture – and skeptical of those who suggested he may be subject to debilitating drug treatments. But having attended the trials in Uzbekistan of several victims of extreme torture, and having worked with survivors from Sierra Leone and elsewhere, I can tell you that yesterday changed my mind entirely and Julian exhibited exactly the symptoms of a torture victim brought blinking into the light, particularly in terms of disorientation, confusion, and the real struggle to assert free will through the fog of learned helplessness.

I had been even more sceptical of those who claimed, as a senior member of his legal team did to me on Sunday night, that they were worried that Julian might not live to the end of the extradition process. I now find myself not only believing it, but haunted by the thought. Everybody in that court yesterday saw that one of the greatest journalists and most important dissidents of our times is being tortured to death by the state, before our eyes. To see my friend, the most articulate man, the fastest thinker, I have ever known, reduced to that shambling and incoherent wreck, was unbearable. Yet the agents of the state, particularly the callous magistrate Vanessa Baraitser, were not just prepared but eager to be a part of this bloodsport. She actually told him that if he were incapable of following proceedings, then his lawyers could explain what had happened to him later. The question of why a man who, by the very charges against him, was acknowledged to be highly intelligent and competent, had been reduced by the state to somebody incapable of following court proceedings, gave her not a millisecond of concern.

The charge against Julian is very specific; conspiring with Chelsea Manning to publish the Iraq War logs, the Afghanistan war logs and the State Department cables. The charges are nothing to do with Sweden, nothing to do with sex, and nothing to do with the 2016 US election; a simple clarification the mainstream media appears incapable of understanding.

The purpose of yesterday’s hearing was case management; to determine the timetable for the extradition proceedings. The key points at issue were that Julian’s defense was requesting more time to prepare their evidence; and arguing that political offenses were specifically excluded from the extradition treaty. There should, they argued, therefore be a preliminary hearing to determine whether the extradition treaty applied at all.

The reasons given by Assange’s defense team for more time to prepare were both compelling and startling. They had very limited access to their client in jail and had not been permitted to hand him any documents about the case until one week ago. He had also only just been given limited computer access, and all his relevant records and materials had been seized from the Ecuadorean Embassy by the US Government; he had no access to his own materials for the purpose of preparing his defense.

Furthermore, the defense argued, they were in touch with the Spanish courts about a very important and relevant legal case in Madrid which would provide vital evidence. It showed that the CIA had been directly ordering spying on Julian in the Embassy through a Spanish company, UC Global, contracted to provide security there. Crucially this included spying on privileged conversations between Assange and his lawyers discussing his defense against these extradition proceedings, which had been in train in the USA since 2010. In any normal process, that fact would in itself be sufficient to have the extradition proceedings dismissed. Incidentally I learnt on Sunday that the Spanish material produced in court, which had been commissioned by the CIA, specifically includes high resolution video coverage of Julian and I discussing various matters.

The evidence to the Spanish court also included a CIA plot to kidnap Assange, which went to the US authorities’ attitude to lawfulness in his case and the treatment he might expect in the United States. Julian’s team explained that the Spanish legal process was happening now and the evidence from it would be extremely important, but it might not be finished and thus the evidence not fully validated and available in time for the current proposed timetable for the Assange extradition hearings.

For the prosecution, James Lewis QC stated that the government strongly opposed any delay being given for the defense to prepare, and strongly opposed any separate consideration of the question of whether the charge was a political offense excluded by the extradition treaty. Baraitser took her cue from Lewis and stated categorically that the date for the extradition hearing, 25 February, could not be changed. She was open to changes in dates for submission of evidence and responses before this, and called a ten minute recess for the prosecution and defense to agree these steps.

What happened next was very instructive. There were five representatives of the US government present (initially three, and two more arrived in the course of the hearing), seated at desks behind the lawyers in court. The prosecution lawyers immediately went into huddle with the US representatives, then went outside the courtroom with them, to decide how to respond on the dates.

After the recess the defense team stated they could not, in their professional opinion, adequately prepare if the hearing date were kept to February, but within Baraitser’s instruction to do so they nevertheless outlined a proposed timetable on delivery of evidence. In responding to this, Lewis’ junior counsel scurried to the back of the court to consult the Americans again while Lewis actually told the judge he was “taking instructions from those behind”. It is important to note that as he said this, it was not the UK Attorney-General’s office who were being consulted but the US Embassy. Lewis received his American instructions and agreed that the defense might have two months to prepare their evidence (they had said they needed an absolute minimum of three) but the February hearing date may not be moved. Baraitser gave a ruling agreeing everything Lewis had said.

At this stage it was unclear why we were sitting through this farce. The US government was dictating its instructions to Lewis, who was relaying those instructions to Baraitser, who was ruling them as her legal decision. The charade might as well have been cut and the US government simply sat on the bench to control the whole process. Nobody could sit there and believe they were in any part of a genuine legal process or that Baraitser was giving a moment’s consideration to the arguments of the defense. Her facial expressions on the few occasions she looked at the defense ranged from contempt through boredom to sarcasm. When she looked at Lewis she was attentive, open and warm.

The extradition is plainly being rushed through in accordance with a Washington dictated timetable. Apart from a desire to pre-empt the Spanish court providing evidence on CIA activity in sabotaging the defense, what makes the February date so important to the USA? I would welcome any thoughts.

Baraitser dismissed the defense’s request for a separate prior hearing to consider whether the extradition treaty applied at all, without bothering to give any reason why (possibly she had not properly memorized what Lewis had been instructing her to agree with). Yet this is Article 4 of the UK/US Extradition Treaty 2007 in full:


On the face of it, what Assange is accused of is the very definition of a political offense– if this is not, then what is? It is not covered by any of the exceptions from that listed. There is every reason to consider whether this charge is excluded by the extradition treaty, and to do so before the long and very costly process of considering all the evidence should the treaty apply. But Baraitser simply dismissed the argument out of hand.

Just in case anybody was left in any doubt as to what was happening here, Lewis then stood up and suggested that the defense should not be allowed to waste the court’s time with a lot of arguments. All arguments for the substantive hearing should be given in writing in advance and a “guillotine should be applied” (his exact words) to arguments and witnesses in court, perhaps of five hours for the defense. The defense had suggested they would need more than the scheduled five days to present their case. Lewis countered that the entire hearing should be over in two days. Baraitser said this was not procedurally the correct moment to agree this but she will consider it once she had received the evidence bundles.

(SPOILER: Baraitser is going to do as Lewis instructs and cut the substantive hearing short).

Baraitser then capped it all by saying the February hearing will be held, not at the comparatively open and accessible Westminster Magistrates Court where we were, but at Belmarsh Magistrates Court, the grim high security facility used for preliminary legal processing of terrorists, attached to the maximum security prison where Assange is being held. There are only six seats for the public in even the largest court at Belmarsh, and the object is plainly to evade public scrutiny and make sure that Baraitser is not exposed in public again to a genuine account of her proceedings, like this one you are reading. I will probably be unable to get in to the substantive hearing at Belmarsh.

Plainly the authorities were disconcerted by the hundreds of good people who had turned up to support Julian. They hope that far fewer will get to the much less accessible Belmarsh. I am fairly certain (and recall I had a long career as a diplomat) that the two extra American government officials who arrived halfway through proceedings were armed security personnel, brought in because of alarm at the number of protesters around a hearing in which were present senior US officials. The move to Belmarsh may be an American initiative.

Assange’s defense team objected strenuously to the move to Belmarsh, in particular on the grounds that there are no conference rooms available there to consult their client and they have very inadequate access to him in the jail. Baraitser dismissed their objection offhand and with a very definite smirk.

Finally, Baraitser turned to Julian and ordered him to stand, and asked him if he had understood the proceedings. He replied in the negative, said that he could not think, and gave every appearance of disorientation. Then he seemed to find an inner strength, drew himself up a little, and said:

I do not understand how this process is equitable. This superpower had 10 years to prepare for this case and I can’t even access my writings. It is very difficult, where I am, to do anything. These people have unlimited resources.

The effort then seemed to become too much, his voice dropped and he became increasingly confused and incoherent. He spoke of whistleblowers and publishers being labeled enemies of the people, then spoke about his children’s DNA being stolen and of being spied on in his meetings with his psychologist. I am not suggesting at all that Julian was wrong about these points, but he could not properly frame nor articulate them. He was plainly not himself, very ill and it was just horribly painful to watch. Baraitser showed neither sympathy nor the least concern. She tartly observed that if he could not understand what had happened, his lawyers could explain it to him, and she swept out of court.

The whole experience was profoundly upsetting. It was very plain that there was no genuine process of legal consideration happening here. What we had was a naked demonstration of the power of the state, and a naked dictation of proceedings by the Americans. Julian was in a box behind bulletproof glass, and I and the thirty odd other members of the public who had squeezed in were in a different box behind more bulletproof glass. I do not know if he could see me or his other friends in the court, or if he was capable of recognizing anybody. He gave no indication that he did.

In Belmarsh he is kept in complete isolation for 23 hours a day. He is permitted 45 minutes exercise. If he has to be moved, they clear the corridors before he walks down them and they lock all cell doors to ensure he has no contact with any other prisoner outside the short and strictly supervised exercise period. There is no possible justification for this inhuman regime, used on major terrorists, being imposed on a publisher who is a remand prisoner.

I have been both cataloguing and protesting for years the increasingly authoritarian powers of the UK state, but that the most gross abuse could be so open and undisguised is still a shock. The campaign of demonization and dehumanization against Julian, based on government and media lie after government and media lie, has led to a situation where he can be slowly killed in public sight, and arraigned on a charge of publishing the truth about government wrongdoing, while receiving no assistance from “liberal” society.

Unless Julian is released shortly he will be destroyed. If the state can do this, then who is next?

Craig Murray is an author, broadcaster, human rights activist, and former diplomat. He was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004 and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010. The article is reprinted on AntiWar.com with permission from his website.

The Guardian

DO NOT BE AFRAID

© MMXIX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

If the US joined the League of Nations, would WWII have occurred?

Morley Evans studied at World History
Answered 25 minutes ago

Yes, probably. No one can answer a question like that definitively. The USA was driven to become the world hegemon, replacing Great Britain and the British Empire from 1776. Consider that we are currently engulfed in a Great War that began in 1753 when the Seven Years War began. Included in this Great War are all the wars since then. Wars in which the USA was involved include the Napoleonic wars of which the War of 1812 was a part, the Spanish-American War, World Wars I & II, the Korean War, the War in Vietnam, and on to the present day. The USA appears to have exhausted itself. It certainly is not the “uni power”. Will China be the new world hegemon? That doesn’t seem to be the Chinese goal, despite what some Americans think. One Belt One Road (OBOR Chinese 一带一路) would tie everyone together in a trade network that would benefit everyone. The world’s people have been moving toward this since time immemorial. Throughout innumerable years, dominant powers have emerged. Every empire has waxed and waned. Empires are like twinkling stars. Do not be afraid. Everything is unfolding as it should.