GOETHE

© MMXVIII VB.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

"Truth has to be repeated constantly, because Error also is being preached all the time, and not just by a few, but by the multitude.  In the Press and Encyclopaedias, in Schools and Universities, everywhere Error holds sway, feeling happy and comfortable in the knowledge of having Majority on its side."   

- Goethe

TET OFFENSIVE

© MMXVIII V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

IF YOU READ the long essay below, you will see that nothing has changed since the War in Vietnam. If you look at history, Vietnam looks like the Korean War. The main difference between the War in Vietnam and today is that the public is silent today. Everyone is in a coma. Then the public was up-in-arms. Protest songs filled the airwaves. Thousands marched in the streets. CBS, NBC, and ABC competed to bring the War into every livingroom every night. The media has been silenced. The Left supports war. The Right supports war. Pulpits are silent. Pews are empty except in the warmongering churches that preach heresy. 

This picture would not appear in the Main Stream Media (MSM) today. Israel Defense Force (IDF) snipers have murdered thousands of unarmed Palestinians on the Gazan border. When it reports anything, the MSM reports "violence" as if Palestinians were responsible. The IDF murders journalists. The Saudis murder journalists. Insanity rules everywhere. Washington wants war. Washington's vassalages support their liege lord. Ottawa will lick American boots on Remembrance Day.

WW III and everyone's annihilation looms. Satan smiles.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/world/asia/vietnam-execution-photo.html

FIFTY YEARS AGO the world received a lesson in the revolutionary power of protracted people’s war when some 84,000 Vietnamese communist peasants stunned the world’s greatest military power, the United States, with an astounding offensive considered impossible by America’s Army generals who had only weeks before declared the communist revolutionaries of South Vietnam essentially defeated.

This amazingly shocking assault was the Tet Offensive of January-February 1968. It was so powerful in its execution and effects that it became the crucial event of America’s Vietnam War. No history of that war can be complete without an analysis of this offensive. The significance of Tet was that it compelled the American leadership to make the decision to quit Vietnam; it was thus the pivot point in the war. Often described as a military loss for the communist forces, it was nonetheless a political loss for the Americans and their Saigon client regime – a loss so great that the United States eventually began a process of gradual, yet brutally violent, disengagement. The study of how that definitive decision to disengage came to be and how it was subsequently interpreted after the war offers important lessons regarding the contradictions of the war exposed by Tet – contradictions involving the imperatives of international finance, the exercise of political power, the dishonesty and incompetence of military leadership, the erosion of America’s moral legitimacy at home and abroad, the reemergence of communist politics within the United States, the dramatic upsurge in leftist resistance globally, and the rewriting of history to hide the failures of the American military.

What was the Tet Offensive? It was the first of three offensives in 1968 in which the communist forces of the National Liberation Front (NLF) in coordination with the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) attempted to take over cities and towns throughout South Vietnam in hopes of causing a collapse of the South Vietnamese government. Tet was the largest of the three offensives and was the one that had the most damaging effect against the United States and its Saigon protégés.  Beginning January 30 and 31 the NLF attacked 5 of 6 major cities including Saigon, 35 of 44 provincial capitals, 64 of 242 district seats, and more than 50 hamlets for a total of 166 targets throughout South Vietnam (Prados, 2009: 239). In this first assault alone, much of the countryside – and thus the rural pacification program–was lost to the communists as the Saigon regime pulled back 8,000 troops to defend towns and cities. On May 4 a second offensive lasting into early June began with attacks on 119 cities, towns and bases. Because the American military had claimed that the first offensive resulted in losses so great for the communist forces that they were “on the ropes” without major offensive capability, the second offensive’s rather substantial nature could not be acknowledged – doing so would be an admission of continuing communist strength. The U.S. military therefore referred to the second offensive as “mini-Tet.” On August 17 a third set of attacks began with fighting continuing for six weeks (Young, 1991: 221-222).  All in all, the Tet Offensive of late January 1968 kicked off a series of communist offensives over a period of eighteen months inflicting relatively high American losses.

READ MORE
https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/11/02/the-significance-of-the-tet-offensive/

UKRAINIAN-RUSSIAN CONFLICT

© MMXVIII V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Thanks to Hersh Bortman for this analysis! Great Map too. I always wondered where Ukraine was. No wonder. Ukrainians don't know themselves!

What causes conflict between Russia and Ukraine?

Hersh Bortman
Hersh Bortman, Israel. I was a USSR citizen.
Answered 3h ago

Cherchez la femme? Not in this case. Beauties have nothing to do with that.

Recherchez de l’Oncle Sam (please correct me if I get wrong the French). Yes, Uncle Sam, he’s the troublemaker. He is the source and the cause of what you call conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

When you’re talking about Ukraine, make sure you know what you are talking about. The “patchwork quilt” below illustrates the timeline of that artificial formation known as Ukraine and which way it is assembled from different parts of the Empire. And are they different! Try to point on any resemble between the horrible Banderovian gang from Lviv and suburbs and the typical jovial merry Odessa crowd or serious faces of the Donbass miners. 
Now consider the green patch. That is the place where Uncle Sam, staring greedily with a lustful gaze in the direction of the Urals and beyond was lying in wait in anticipation of the convenient moment to attack Russia to continue its crumbling after the collapse of the USSR.

The moment to charge came when Viktor Yanukovych announced that Ukraine is not going to join EU. The specially trained (on NATO facilities in Poland) neo-Nazi gangs were brought to Kiev, Victoria Nuland in charge, and the so-called Euromaidan was underway. 

[Stalin made Kazakhstan an independent Soviet republic inside the USSR. When the United Nations was created, Washington introduced all 50 States as independent countries. The USSR countered with its own (Union of) Soviet Socialist Republics.]

Says George Friedman:

“The collapse of the Soviet Union appeared to signal Russia’s demise as an international player, but news of that death was premature. A nation so large, so filled with resources, and so strategically located doesn’t simply dissolve into the air. In the 1990s, the USSR’s fall nonetheless shattered the vast empire assembled by the czars and held together by the Communists, leaving Moscow in control of a fraction of what it held in 1989. Muscovy alone (and Siberia), the region that had been the kernel of the empire, remained in Russian hands. As long as that core remained, however, the game wasn’t over. The Russian Federation, sorely weakened, still survived, and it will play an increasingly significant role in the next decade. While Russia suffered breakaway regions and an economy in shambles, the United States emerged as the sole remaining global power, able to dominate the planet in a casual, almost indolent fashion. But the Soviet collapse gave the United States only a limited time frame in which to drive a stake into the heart of its old rival, ensuring that it stayed down (emphasis by H.B.). The United States could have applied stress to the Russian system by supporting secessionist movements or by increasing economic pressure. Such moves might very well have caused the entire Russian Federation to crumble, enabling its former junior partners to absorb what was left and form a new balance of power in Eurasia. At the time, however, the effort did not seem worth the risk, mostly because Russia appeared unlikely to emerge from its chaos for generations. Destroying what was left of Russian power did not even appear to be necessary, because the United States could create the regional balance of power it wanted simply by expanding NATO and the alliance system eastward.”

A stake in the heart of its old rival, eh?!

Too late.

Eat your heart out, Uncle Sam. You missed a real chance. Another will never be.

What was the question again? What causes conflict between Russia and Ukraine?

No sir, they lie to you it’s not between Russia and Ukraine. It’s between the USA and Russian Federation.

Morley Evans

The United States did all of those things to destroy the Russian Federation. Americans are still doing them but Russia hasn't collapsed. Russia keeps getting stronger. Washington is getting desperate. WW III is coming closer and closer. Blame Washington. Stop Washington before we are all killed.

MORE GLOBAL WARMING

© MMXVIII V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

GLOBAL WARMING REVISITED

© MMXCVIII V.1.0.0
By Morley Evans

So much for the "scientific" community who all agree that the world is melting. "I'm melting! I'm melting!"

JULIAN ASSANGE

© MMXVIII V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

JULIAN ASSANGE ON TED

THE ROBERT MUELLER REPORT

© MMXVIII V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Jimmy Dore doesn't want to gloat. But being an honest man, he is gloating. There never was a Russia Gate scandal. Except that Hillary the Witch, herself, was in bed with the Ruskies when she was the Secretary of State. Oops. Hillary engineered everything to divert everyone's attention from the nasty facts. 

The money the Ruskies paid Hillary for a 20% stake in U.S. uranium went into the Clinton Foundation. That's where the aid to Haiti went. Will anyone ever know about this? Will anyone ever know who killed JFK or RFK or MLK?


They might. Stay tuned.