© MMX V.1.0.4
by Morley Evans
The CMPA is the Canadian Medical Protective Association (founded in 1901). What to do about it? Can it be reformed? Can it be controlled?
I was tortured for eight years. Then I slipped into a coma. It has taken me eighteen years to crawl out of the grave that was dug for me by the doctor who was prescribing Zocor and a second doctor who almost finished me off with Lipitor. [1] No one responsible offered me anything. They certainly didn't offer any medical relief. No one charged with protecting the public did his job either. There was no day in court, no out of court settlement, no offer, no sympathy, not even one kind word. They swept me under the carpet after they laughed in my face. The shadowy CMPA — which is the most powerful medical organization in Canada — was founded "to protect the reputations of physicians." That sounds innocent enough.
The CMPA has protected bastards for over a century by subverting justice. Canada's legal system is a joke, especially with regards to doctors, but not only them. The criminal CMPA is directly responsible. Nothing is too outrageous to be excused and ignored, so beware.
Am I unique? Perhaps, but only in the sense that I survived the Canadian "health care system" here in Regina. Next time I might not be so lucky. Then again, the Power above may be protecting me to denounce this evil.
If the airline industry were run like the doctor business in Canada, dozens of planes would be crashing every week. The airline industry is completely different because it is run by responsible people who give a damn about the safety of their customers. Despite crashes and deaths, the auto business is nearly as good when one considers the astronomical number of passenger miles driven without incident every year. Even the Mafia cares more about its customers than established Canadian medicine. Others care, or they go out of business: Not the CMPA and the rest who run established medicine in Canada.
These scum cannot be reformed. They can go to Hell.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Blackhawk Down
© MMX V.1.0.5
by Morley Evans
The movie, Blackhawk Down, is about the Battle of Mogadishu (1993). The Wikipedia article ends with these words:
The film ends with text informing the viewer that "1000 Somalis died and 19 Americans lost their lives in the conflict. Mike Durant was released after 11 days of captivity. On August 2, 1996, warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid was killed in Mogadishu. General Garrison retired the following day."
All American war movies [1], including such work as Full Metal Jacket and She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, focus upon the trials and tribulations of American soldiers as they battle faceless enemies. The enemies in Blackhawk Down, called "skinnies", are usually silhouettes shooting at us. We don't know who they are or why our solders are fighting them or what was gained or lost after our guys won. Wikipedia estimates between 500 and 1500 Somalis were killed versus 18 Americans and one Malaysian. This ridiculous kill ratio is consistent with current figures from Iraq and Afghanistan as well as Vietnam and Korea. But in the essay on the Battle of Mogadishu (1993) these figures are quite different: The Somalis did much better when they counted their own dead.
American forces have always done well, in this sense. Americans have never paid a heavy price, despite what is generally believed by Americans. In WWI [2] and WW II [3], American losses were 2% of the total military slaughtered and even less when civilians are included. American civilians have never been touched. The appalling statistics are unknown by the general American public. Movies like Blackhawk Down, with images of blood drenched GIs, reinforce this misconception.
Did our guys win? Win? They killed lots of Somalis, but Somalia is still a lawless mess, an armed camp that is hostile to the U.S. The original reason for going to Somalia was humanitarian aid. So the mission to Somalia was actually a failure. It was a fiasco. The helicopter manufacturers did well, of course, as did other armament contractors.
The Battle of Mogadishu (1993) was undertaken during the administration of William Jefferson Clinton. The Somalia invasion was one of the first things done in the new post Cold War era when the threat of the Soviet Union was gone. The official White House Clinton biography gives no hint at all about Somalia. As far as the White House is concerned, "the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history." [4] How nice.
[1] Does anyone else make war movies, or war TV shows, or war games, or war toys, or feature soldiers, airmen, and sailors on daytime game shows like The Price Is Right? "War is Hell," Sherman observed but war can be fun too as we learned from Sergeant Bilko, The Dirty Dozen and Kelly's Heroes. I Dream of Genie featured servicemen in uniform. British war movies such as Bridge on the River Kwai, Lawrence of Arabia and Mrs. Miniver were made by Hollywood.
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wwi_casualties
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWII_Casualties
[4] http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/williamjClinton
by Morley Evans
The movie, Blackhawk Down, is about the Battle of Mogadishu (1993). The Wikipedia article ends with these words:
The film ends with text informing the viewer that "1000 Somalis died and 19 Americans lost their lives in the conflict. Mike Durant was released after 11 days of captivity. On August 2, 1996, warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid was killed in Mogadishu. General Garrison retired the following day."
All American war movies [1], including such work as Full Metal Jacket and She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, focus upon the trials and tribulations of American soldiers as they battle faceless enemies. The enemies in Blackhawk Down, called "skinnies", are usually silhouettes shooting at us. We don't know who they are or why our solders are fighting them or what was gained or lost after our guys won. Wikipedia estimates between 500 and 1500 Somalis were killed versus 18 Americans and one Malaysian. This ridiculous kill ratio is consistent with current figures from Iraq and Afghanistan as well as Vietnam and Korea. But in the essay on the Battle of Mogadishu (1993) these figures are quite different: The Somalis did much better when they counted their own dead.
American forces have always done well, in this sense. Americans have never paid a heavy price, despite what is generally believed by Americans. In WWI [2] and WW II [3], American losses were 2% of the total military slaughtered and even less when civilians are included. American civilians have never been touched. The appalling statistics are unknown by the general American public. Movies like Blackhawk Down, with images of blood drenched GIs, reinforce this misconception.
Did our guys win? Win? They killed lots of Somalis, but Somalia is still a lawless mess, an armed camp that is hostile to the U.S. The original reason for going to Somalia was humanitarian aid. So the mission to Somalia was actually a failure. It was a fiasco. The helicopter manufacturers did well, of course, as did other armament contractors.
The Battle of Mogadishu (1993) was undertaken during the administration of William Jefferson Clinton. The Somalia invasion was one of the first things done in the new post Cold War era when the threat of the Soviet Union was gone. The official White House Clinton biography gives no hint at all about Somalia. As far as the White House is concerned, "the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history." [4] How nice.
[1] Does anyone else make war movies, or war TV shows, or war games, or war toys, or feature soldiers, airmen, and sailors on daytime game shows like The Price Is Right? "War is Hell," Sherman observed but war can be fun too as we learned from Sergeant Bilko, The Dirty Dozen and Kelly's Heroes. I Dream of Genie featured servicemen in uniform. British war movies such as Bridge on the River Kwai, Lawrence of Arabia and Mrs. Miniver were made by Hollywood.
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wwi_casualties
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWII_Casualties
[4] http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/williamjClinton
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Henry David Thoreau
© MMX V.1.0.0
There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.
Henry David Thoreau
There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.
Henry David Thoreau
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Believe It Or Not!
© MMX 1.0.2
by Morley Evans
I had another outstanding day at the gym today:
I am 62 years old. I am healthier now than when I was 26, or 16, or 6. I was in a coma in June 2000. Since I eliminated the meds that were killing me along with the doctors who were prescribing them and added Juice Plus+ to my nutrition regimen, I have been improving month after month. Will I live another sixty years? That is the plan.
Whether your own journey to optimal wellness is longer or shorter than mine, a long life with good health should be your plan too!
You can find out more here — http://www.morleyevansjuiceplus.com
by Morley Evans
I had another outstanding day at the gym today:
I am 62 years old. I am healthier now than when I was 26, or 16, or 6. I was in a coma in June 2000. Since I eliminated the meds that were killing me along with the doctors who were prescribing them and added Juice Plus+ to my nutrition regimen, I have been improving month after month. Will I live another sixty years? That is the plan.
Whether your own journey to optimal wellness is longer or shorter than mine, a long life with good health should be your plan too!
You can find out more here — http://www.morleyevansjuiceplus.com
Monday, February 15, 2010
Shun them
© MMX V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans
Here is a comment I just posted on www.AntiWar.com with regards to a warmongering advertisement by Elie Wiesel in the New York Times:
• posted on AntiWar.com http://original.antiwar.com/john-v-walsh/2010/02/14/elie-wiesels-ignoble-recruits/
“Endorsement by Nobel Laureates once lent gravitas to one's case, but then the Nobel Committee exposed itself when they gave a Nobel Prize to fraudster Al Gore. The so-called State of "Israel" sits in flagrante delicto atop what may be the worst human rights record in history. And the claim that the United States is the world's moral leader is pasted over the 20th Century — "The American Century" — which was history's greatest bloodbath. These buffoons have nothing to teach the world. They should be the subject of ridicule. They should be shunned by decent people.”
by Morley Evans
Here is a comment I just posted on www.AntiWar.com with regards to a warmongering advertisement by Elie Wiesel in the New York Times:
• posted on AntiWar.com http://original.antiwar.com/john-v-walsh/2010/02/14/elie-wiesels-ignoble-recruits/
“Endorsement by Nobel Laureates once lent gravitas to one's case, but then the Nobel Committee exposed itself when they gave a Nobel Prize to fraudster Al Gore. The so-called State of "Israel" sits in flagrante delicto atop what may be the worst human rights record in history. And the claim that the United States is the world's moral leader is pasted over the 20th Century — "The American Century" — which was history's greatest bloodbath. These buffoons have nothing to teach the world. They should be the subject of ridicule. They should be shunned by decent people.”
Illegitimi non carborundum
© MMX V.1.1.1
by Morley Evans
Illegitimi non carborundum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegitimi_non_carborundum
by Morley Evans
Illegitimi non carborundum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegitimi_non_carborundum
Monday, February 8, 2010
Killing Hope
© MMX V.1.0.8
by Morley Evans
Killing Hope by William Blum
THIS IS A WONDERFUL BOOK!
I had no idea that the United States was as active as it has been since WW II. The military and the CIA have been in overdrive everywhere for 65 years. Killing Hope deals with events after 1945. Before that, of course, there was WW II, the interwar period (1918 to 1939), WW I, the run-up to WW I, the Spanish American War and the building of the Panama Canal with interventions in Central America and Colombia. Washington was not asleep before the 20th Century, either. The United States has been up to its neck in everything throughout its history. You can look that up in Appendix II.
After looking at things through the eyes of our enemies, I believe we in the West have all been the victims of a never-ending series of elaborate hoaxes that have been perpetrated by our élites. Our enemies were never as big and scary as we believed they were. We, on the other hand, were always very big and scary.
The Twentieth Century looks to me like a giant power grab with the Anglo-American empire (that's us good guys, you know) taking over the world. We were trying to forestall losing our preeminent position as others caught up to us. Before WW I, the British were desperately afraid of Germany which was making better stuff and selling it for less. Before WW II, the United States was desperately afraid of Japan for the same reason. Nobody imagined that India and China would ever get up off the floor where we put them, but they have.
The Chinese can thank Richard M. Nixon for opening the door to China in 1972. Samuel Gompers must have been spinning in his grave. Everyone is catching up: It was inevitable because people are smart and they learn from each other.
In times going back long before Marco Polo, all the good stuff was coming from India and China. The great goal in Europe was to get to India, China and Japan. The Portuguese went around Africa. The Spanish went west and ran into the Americas. Then they continued on across the Pacific. The British and Dutch were fast on their heels.
Five Hundred years after Columbus, China and India are important again. Japan and Germany have been leading economies for decades — after they were bombed into the stone age and crushed in 1945. If one doesn't count Grenada and Panama, we haven't won a war since The Great Victory of '45. Whoda thunk that would happen? We have been doing our best, but hope is hard to kill.
by Morley Evans
Killing Hope by William Blum
THIS IS A WONDERFUL BOOK!
I had no idea that the United States was as active as it has been since WW II. The military and the CIA have been in overdrive everywhere for 65 years. Killing Hope deals with events after 1945. Before that, of course, there was WW II, the interwar period (1918 to 1939), WW I, the run-up to WW I, the Spanish American War and the building of the Panama Canal with interventions in Central America and Colombia. Washington was not asleep before the 20th Century, either. The United States has been up to its neck in everything throughout its history. You can look that up in Appendix II.
After looking at things through the eyes of our enemies, I believe we in the West have all been the victims of a never-ending series of elaborate hoaxes that have been perpetrated by our élites. Our enemies were never as big and scary as we believed they were. We, on the other hand, were always very big and scary.
The Twentieth Century looks to me like a giant power grab with the Anglo-American empire (that's us good guys, you know) taking over the world. We were trying to forestall losing our preeminent position as others caught up to us. Before WW I, the British were desperately afraid of Germany which was making better stuff and selling it for less. Before WW II, the United States was desperately afraid of Japan for the same reason. Nobody imagined that India and China would ever get up off the floor where we put them, but they have.
The Chinese can thank Richard M. Nixon for opening the door to China in 1972. Samuel Gompers must have been spinning in his grave. Everyone is catching up: It was inevitable because people are smart and they learn from each other.
In times going back long before Marco Polo, all the good stuff was coming from India and China. The great goal in Europe was to get to India, China and Japan. The Portuguese went around Africa. The Spanish went west and ran into the Americas. Then they continued on across the Pacific. The British and Dutch were fast on their heels.
Five Hundred years after Columbus, China and India are important again. Japan and Germany have been leading economies for decades — after they were bombed into the stone age and crushed in 1945. If one doesn't count Grenada and Panama, we haven't won a war since The Great Victory of '45. Whoda thunk that would happen? We have been doing our best, but hope is hard to kill.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Orthodox Jews in Palestine
© MMX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans
ORTHODOX JEWS IN PALESTINE CONDEMN REMARKS BY YONA METZGER
NETUREI KARTA of THE ORTHODOX JEWRY
JERUSALEM, PALESTINE
Jan 31.08
http://www.nkusa.org/activities/Statements/20080131_nkpalestine.cfm
URGENT PRESS RELEASE
In the past week the so-called Chief Rabbi of the so-called State of "Israel", Yona Metzger, has made vicious and provocative statements asserting that the Palestinians living in Gaza should be moved from their homes into the Sinai desert.
Yona Metzger is not an authentic Torah authority, despite the fact that he carries the so-called title of "Chief Rabbi". Chief rabbis of the Zionist State only carry legitimacy in the eyes of Zionist Jews. His status as a chief rabbi is not unlike the leadership of Theodor Herzl, who also wore a beard!
The State of "Israel" is illegitimate according to the Torah teachings. The founding of the State of "Israel" is in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Torah which forbids the establishment of a Jewish state and commands Jews to remain in exile until released from that exile by G-d Himself, without any human intervention, at which time all nations of the world will live together in peace.
We are likewise forbidden to rebel against any nation. We are to remain peaceful and loyal citizens, in every country in which we reside. Therefore to oppress the Palestinian people, harm them, steal their land, expel them, etc. is totally forbidden according to our Holy Torah.
The Rabbinical authorities universally have stood in vehement opposition to the ideology of Zionism and have opposed the state of "Israel" from its creation until the present day.
Palestinians have an inherent right to return to their land in historic Palestine and to establish their independent state in the entire Holy Land, which was forcefully taken from them by the Zionists. Indeed, many Gazans are refugees who were expelled from other areas of Palestine by the Zionists ever since 1948.
Chief Rabbis of the Zionist state, whether Metzger or anyone else, are merely very well-paid stooges of the Zionists and serve their Zionist masters without regard for the welfare of the Jewish People, the Palestinians, or any other nation in the world.
The Chief Rabbinate of the Zionist State, just as all Zionist institutions, has importance only because of its coercive power over the religious, economic and everyday life of the Jewish residents of Zionist occupied Palestine. Whoever recognizes and supports the Zionist State, even innocently, has been taken over by the heretical Zionist movement, no matter how large the halo that it is granted by supposed Jewish authorities.
Chief Rabbis, and other rabbis who support the existence of the Zionist state, are wicked emissaries of evil. Such "rabbis" promote hatred and war, and use their coercive powers to demand subservience of Jews to the Zionist enterprise. This description that we posit of such people has been the long-standing position of authentic rabbis for the last century.
Yona Metzger expresses feelings of inhumanity which originates in his loyalty to the cult of Zionism and is perfectly prepared to sacrifice Jewish lives on the altar of his idolatry, the State of "Israel." Any moral person would much prefer to see the Zionist warmongers, including Metzger, removed from the Holy Land. METZGER AND ALL ZIONIST RABBIS DO NOT REPRESENT THE JEWISH RELIGION.
We urgently appeal to the leaders of the world nations, especially the great powers, to stop supporting the Zionist regime. Many nations believe that supporting Zionism shows friendship to the Jewish People. This is incorrect! True friendship to the Jewish People can be demonstrated by saving all the peoples of the Middle East, including Jews, from the bloodthirsty machinations of the dangerous State of "Israel" and by dismantling the Zionist regime entirely, peacefully and speedily in our day.
May Almighty G-d protect us from the influence of Zionism in general, their evil warmongering bloodthirsty leaders, and from their wicked servants who call themselves "rabbis."
by Morley Evans
ORTHODOX JEWS IN PALESTINE CONDEMN REMARKS BY YONA METZGER
NETUREI KARTA of THE ORTHODOX JEWRY
JERUSALEM, PALESTINE
Jan 31.08
http://www.nkusa.org/activities/Statements/20080131_nkpalestine.cfm
URGENT PRESS RELEASE
In the past week the so-called Chief Rabbi of the so-called State of "Israel", Yona Metzger, has made vicious and provocative statements asserting that the Palestinians living in Gaza should be moved from their homes into the Sinai desert.
Yona Metzger is not an authentic Torah authority, despite the fact that he carries the so-called title of "Chief Rabbi". Chief rabbis of the Zionist State only carry legitimacy in the eyes of Zionist Jews. His status as a chief rabbi is not unlike the leadership of Theodor Herzl, who also wore a beard!
The State of "Israel" is illegitimate according to the Torah teachings. The founding of the State of "Israel" is in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Torah which forbids the establishment of a Jewish state and commands Jews to remain in exile until released from that exile by G-d Himself, without any human intervention, at which time all nations of the world will live together in peace.
We are likewise forbidden to rebel against any nation. We are to remain peaceful and loyal citizens, in every country in which we reside. Therefore to oppress the Palestinian people, harm them, steal their land, expel them, etc. is totally forbidden according to our Holy Torah.
The Rabbinical authorities universally have stood in vehement opposition to the ideology of Zionism and have opposed the state of "Israel" from its creation until the present day.
Palestinians have an inherent right to return to their land in historic Palestine and to establish their independent state in the entire Holy Land, which was forcefully taken from them by the Zionists. Indeed, many Gazans are refugees who were expelled from other areas of Palestine by the Zionists ever since 1948.
Chief Rabbis of the Zionist state, whether Metzger or anyone else, are merely very well-paid stooges of the Zionists and serve their Zionist masters without regard for the welfare of the Jewish People, the Palestinians, or any other nation in the world.
The Chief Rabbinate of the Zionist State, just as all Zionist institutions, has importance only because of its coercive power over the religious, economic and everyday life of the Jewish residents of Zionist occupied Palestine. Whoever recognizes and supports the Zionist State, even innocently, has been taken over by the heretical Zionist movement, no matter how large the halo that it is granted by supposed Jewish authorities.
Chief Rabbis, and other rabbis who support the existence of the Zionist state, are wicked emissaries of evil. Such "rabbis" promote hatred and war, and use their coercive powers to demand subservience of Jews to the Zionist enterprise. This description that we posit of such people has been the long-standing position of authentic rabbis for the last century.
Yona Metzger expresses feelings of inhumanity which originates in his loyalty to the cult of Zionism and is perfectly prepared to sacrifice Jewish lives on the altar of his idolatry, the State of "Israel." Any moral person would much prefer to see the Zionist warmongers, including Metzger, removed from the Holy Land. METZGER AND ALL ZIONIST RABBIS DO NOT REPRESENT THE JEWISH RELIGION.
We urgently appeal to the leaders of the world nations, especially the great powers, to stop supporting the Zionist regime. Many nations believe that supporting Zionism shows friendship to the Jewish People. This is incorrect! True friendship to the Jewish People can be demonstrated by saving all the peoples of the Middle East, including Jews, from the bloodthirsty machinations of the dangerous State of "Israel" and by dismantling the Zionist regime entirely, peacefully and speedily in our day.
May Almighty G-d protect us from the influence of Zionism in general, their evil warmongering bloodthirsty leaders, and from their wicked servants who call themselves "rabbis."
Anecdotal
© MMX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans
"You say my evidence is "anecdotal"?
Don't worry, I won't try to sell you something, but I must object to your use of "anecdotal". This term is commonly used by people who base their own claim on "argument from authority" — which is, itself, completely worthless.
For example, Urologists can, and do, dismiss Bell Ezeeflow Tea as having no value. Thousands of men, like me, can tell them their prostate problem disappeared when they started drinking Bell Tea. A Urologist can counter with, "You have only provided "anecdotal" evidence. I, on the other hand, graduated from a prestigious medical school, wear a white lab coat over my thousand-dollar suit and wear a stethoscope around my neck. I have the legal right to prescribe drugs to men suffering from prostate disease and you don't. Therefore, I know what I'm talking about. I make a million dollars a year, live in a big house, have a beautiful wife and children and golf at the Prestigious Country Club with other doctors, lawyers and judges. I am a doctor."
It doesn't matter to the unwary that the Urologist has only third-hand knowledge (at best) of the research that supports his treatment or that the Urologist's treatment does not work and that Bell Tea does work. It does not matter that Bell Tea results are replicated every day in "anecdotal" experiments. What does matter is that if men suffering from prostate disease all drank Bell Ezeeflow tea, the Urologist would be out of business.
So it really comes down to selling stuff. I'd rather get well than help pay for the Urologist's membership at the golf club and die. Over 60% of men over fifty have prostate disease. It's your choice.
by Morley Evans
"You say my evidence is "anecdotal"?
Don't worry, I won't try to sell you something, but I must object to your use of "anecdotal". This term is commonly used by people who base their own claim on "argument from authority" — which is, itself, completely worthless.
For example, Urologists can, and do, dismiss Bell Ezeeflow Tea as having no value. Thousands of men, like me, can tell them their prostate problem disappeared when they started drinking Bell Tea. A Urologist can counter with, "You have only provided "anecdotal" evidence. I, on the other hand, graduated from a prestigious medical school, wear a white lab coat over my thousand-dollar suit and wear a stethoscope around my neck. I have the legal right to prescribe drugs to men suffering from prostate disease and you don't. Therefore, I know what I'm talking about. I make a million dollars a year, live in a big house, have a beautiful wife and children and golf at the Prestigious Country Club with other doctors, lawyers and judges. I am a doctor."
It doesn't matter to the unwary that the Urologist has only third-hand knowledge (at best) of the research that supports his treatment or that the Urologist's treatment does not work and that Bell Tea does work. It does not matter that Bell Tea results are replicated every day in "anecdotal" experiments. What does matter is that if men suffering from prostate disease all drank Bell Ezeeflow tea, the Urologist would be out of business.
So it really comes down to selling stuff. I'd rather get well than help pay for the Urologist's membership at the golf club and die. Over 60% of men over fifty have prostate disease. It's your choice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
