EVERYONE HATES US!

© MMXVI V.1.0.6
by Morley Evans

Today, Palestine. Tomorrow, the World. "We control the United States!"

The very foundation of the Zionist ideology is the belief that "Everyone Hates Us." The solution to the problem that Zionists think they face is the creation of a nation-state with a powerful military. Anyone who opposes anything Zionists do is branded an "anti-Semite" which is their handy "get out of jail free card" in life's big Monopoly game. There are many errors in the Zionist ideological morass. Zionism is, in fact, the product of racist paranoiac minds. Clever as some might be, all Zionists are insane. Let's look at their premise. 

EVERYONE HATES US!

Is it true that "everyone hates us?" Yes, it is true. Everyone hates Zionists. Why? They hate what Zionists have done, what Zionists are doing, and what Zionists plan to do. Zionists are nuts. Zionists are a clear and present danger to the human race and to life on earth. Zionists hate everyone. That includes you, pilgrim. Some Jews claim that Zionists tutored the Nazis using Nazis to get rid of the Jews who opposed Zionism. (Before the Holocaust, all Jews opposed Zionism! After the Holocaust, Israel turned Germany into a cash cow.) That explains why Zionists resemble Nazis. Some claim that Zionists are agents of Satan AKA Lucifer. Could be. . .

Benyamin "BiBi" Netanyahu, Prime Minister of the so-called "Jewish" State

paranoid

ˈperəˌnoid/

adjective

1. 1. 

   of, characterized by, or suffering from the mental condition of paranoia.

   "paranoid schizophrenia"
   

   • 
     

     
     

noun

     1. 

a person who is paranoid.

Merriam-Webster's definition of paranoid

1. 1:  characterized by or resembling paranoia
2. 2:  characterized by suspiciousness, persecutory trends, or megalomania
3. 3:  extremely fearful

paranoia /ˌparəˈnɔɪə/ ♫

▶ noun [mass noun] a mental condition characterized by delusions of persecution, unwarranted jealousy, or exaggerated self-importance, typically worked into an organized system. It may be an aspect of chronic personality disorder, of drug abuse, or of a serious condition such as schizophrenia in which the person loses touch with reality.

• unjustified suspicion and mistrust of other people:
mild paranoia afflicts all prime ministers.

→ paranoiac /ˌparəˈnɔɪɪk, ˌparəˈnɔɪak/ ♫adjective & noun,

→ paranoiacally /ˌparəˈnɔɪɪk(ə)li, ˌparəˈnɔɪak(ə)li/ ♫ adverb,

→ paranoic /ˌparəˈnɔɪɪk/ adjective,

→ paranoically /ˌparəˈnɔɪɪk(ə)li/ adverb

– origin early 19th century: modern Latin, from Greek, from paranoos ‘distracted’, from para ‘irregular’ + noos ‘mind’.

United Nations Security Council 

resolution 2334

http://www.nkusa.org/activities/demonstrations/eventselection.cfm?EventID=9

A few more thoughts: 

http://www.nkusa.org

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46127.htm

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1506.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neturei_Karta

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2017/Jan-03/387701-report-israeli-military-turns-blind-eye-to-attacks-on-palestinians.ashx

ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION

© MMXVI V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

The Blue Pill of Happiness

POSSIBLY rivaling Statin Drugs, osteoporosis and blood pressure medication as money-makers, one of the most popular pharmaceutical creations has been Viagra (from Pfizer) and its copy-cat competitors. Below, are some reasons no one should ever take ED drugs. I have serious doubts about pharmaceutical medicine itself. Could it be that it has nothing to offer anyone? Is the belief that modern medicine is creating vistas of happiness, health and longevity a myth promoted each night by the vast TV brainwashing system? What, exactly, did medicine have to offer before Fleming gave doctors the magic bullet (Penicilan) in 1945? Doctors had non-steroidal anti-inflamatory drugs (Aspirin), opiates (Heroin and Morphine), and sulfa drugs (from Bayer). Antacids have been prescribed for over a century. Doctors were still engaged in blood-letting in the early twentieth century. I have read that maggots do work well to sanitize wounds and promote healing. Leeches may have some use too.

What's new? There are two types of stroke, hemorrhagic and ischemic. Archaeology tells us that craniotomy was performed to treat hemorrhagic stroke in ancient Egypt 5,000 years ago. How did they know what to do?

Cures for the condition called Erectile Dysfunction (ED) are mainly sold to people who know nothing about sex and pleasing women — practically everyone, including women. We boys got our sex-education from the basketball coach, Lorne Aston, in one session of his health class when I was in Grade 12 (1966). He didn’t know a thing, neither did any of the boys, especially those who pretended they did. It makes one wonder from where all these 8 billion people today came. Below are the risks associated with the pharmaceutical treatment of Erectile Dysfunction.


READ THIS:
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/viagra-side-effects.html

____________________________

Harry Truman on the CIA

© MMXVI V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

A review of history reveals that the underlying mission of the United States has been since the USA was established, complete global domination. Evil, which is always at war with virtue, began to gain the upper hand when Truman created the CIA after WW II.

In 1960, out-going U.S. President, Dwight Eisenhower, told John F. Kennedy that he had tried for eight years to get control of  the CIA. Eisenhower, who was a master manager, could not do it.

A Frankenstein monster had been created.

Truman’s True Warning on the CIA

December 22, 2013

Exclusive: National security secrecy and a benighted sense of “what’s good for the country” can be a dangerous mix for democracy, empowering self-interested or misguided officials to supplant the people’s will, as President Truman warned and ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern explains.

By Ray McGovern

Fifty years ago, exactly one month after John Kennedy was killed, the Washington Post published an op-ed titled “Limit CIA Role to Intelligence.” The first sentence of that op-ed on Dec. 22, 1963, read, “I think it has become necessary to take another look at the purpose and operations of our Central Intelligence Agency.”

It sounded like the intro to a bleat from some liberal professor or journalist. Not so. The writer was former President Harry S. Truman, who spearheaded the establishment of the CIA 66 years ago, right after World War II, to better coordinate U.S. intelligence gathering. But the spy agency had lurched off in what Truman thought were troubling directions.

Sadly, those concerns that Truman expressed in that op-ed — that he had inadvertently helped create a Frankenstein monster — are as valid today as they were 50 years ago, if not more so.

Truman began his article by underscoring “the original reason why I thought it necessary to organize this Agency … and what I expected it to do.” It would be “charged with the collection of all intelligence reports from every available source, and to have those reports reach me as President without Department ‘treatment’ or interpretations.”

Truman then moved quickly to one of the main things bothering him. He wrote “the most important thing was to guard against the chance of intelligence being used to influence or to lead the President into unwise decisions.”

It was not difficult to see this as a reference to how one of the agency’s early directors, Allen Dulles, tried to trick President Kennedy into sending U.S. forces to rescue the group of invaders who had landed on the beach at the Bay of Pigs, Cuba, in April 1961 with no chance of success, absent the speedy commitment of U.S. air and ground support.

Wallowing in the Bay of Pigs

Arch-Establishment figure Allen Dulles had been offended when young President Kennedy had the temerity to ask questions about CIA plans before the Bay of Pigs debacle, which had been set in motion under President Dwight Eisenhower. When Kennedy made it clear he would NOT approve the use of U.S. combat forces, Dulles set out, with supreme confidence, to mousetrap the President.

Coffee-stained notes handwritten by Allen Dulles were discovered after his death and reported by historian Lucien S. Vandenbroucke. They show how Dulles drew Kennedy into a plan that was virtually certain to require the use of U.S. combat forces. In his notes, Dulles explained that, “when the chips were down,” Kennedy would be forced by “the realities of the situation” to give whatever military support was necessary “rather than permit the enterprise to fail.”

The “enterprise” which Dulles said could not fail was, of course, the overthrow of Fidel Castro. After mounting several failed operations to assassinate him, this time Dulles meant to get his man, with little or no attention to how the Russians might react. The reckless Joint Chiefs of Staff, whom then-Deputy Secretary of State George Ball later described as a “sewer of deceit,” relished any chance to confront the Soviet Union and give it, at least, a black eye.

But Kennedy stuck to his guns, so to speak. He fired Dulles and his co-conspirators a few months after the abortive invasion, and told a friend that he wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.” The outrage was very obviously mutual.

When Kennedy himself was assassinated on Nov. 22, 1963, it must have occurred to Truman as it did to many others that the disgraced Dulles and his unrepentant associates might not be above conspiring to get rid of a president they felt was soft on Communism and get even for their Bay of Pigs fiasco.

READ MORE:"
https://consortiumnews.com/2013/12/22/trumans-true-warning-on-the-cia/

EAST ALEPPO December 16, 2016

© MMXVI V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

This is East Aleppo, December 16, 2016. 

This "tragedy," as U.S. Secretary of State, John Kerry, calls it is not an act of God or some unknown agency. This disaster is the direct result of the United States foreign policy which decided to remove the government of Syria (supported by 99% of the Syrian people, Shia, Sunni, Druze, Alawite, and Christian) and replace it with a compliant government of Washington's choosing. Syria was to be dismantled and looted.

Death and devastation is the not-so-nice hallmark of American hegemony. Hold your nose and look.

The "Syrian civil war" was an invasion by a CIA secret army calling itself, at various times, ISIS, then ISIL, IS, now Islamic State. It is organized, trained, funded, supplied and directed by Washington through its allies in Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the other Gulf Emirates, and Turkey. The core of these forces came from Iraq. They were unemployed Sunnis who were displaced when the United States destroyed Iraq and placed Shia in charge. The Syrians of East Aleppo were, and some still are, hostages of the invaders who use them as human shields and media pawns for the lamestream Western media which brainwashes Western minds.

Russia saved Syria from total annihilation by helping Syrian government troops defeat the invaders and rescue the hostages. John Kerry — himself — is directly responsible for the war crimes along with everyone involved with the blood-drenched Obama Presidency, especially Hillary Clinton, the previous Secretary of State. The Nobel Committee should strip Obama of the Nobel Peace Prize they gave him before his Presidency had even begun.

The gallows awaits war criminals and traitors, as Hillary Clinton and the rest know.

The "tragedy" John Kerry bemoans is the defeat of his CIA secret army known variously as ISIS/ISIL/IS and Islamic State as well as its numerous transmogrifications, al Qaeda, al-Nusra Front, et al. Kerry could not care less about the hundreds of thousands of Syrians his soldiers have killed or have been forced to run for their lives or for the peace his "freedon fighters" continue to sabotage.


Background to consider:

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/12/16/the-cold-war-continued-post-election-russophobia/

https://williamblum.org

______________________

JOURNALISM

© MMXVI V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” 

- George Orwell

That makes me a journalist, doesn't it?

WHY DID THE U.S. NOT NUKE THE SOVIET UNION AFTER WW II?

© MMXVI V.1.0.5
by Morley Evans

Quora asks: Why didn't the United States attack the Soviet Union after World War II (as General Patton suggested it should)? The time wasn't right. But the idea was never abandoned.

After John F. Kennedy became the U.S. President in 1961, Four Star General Lyman Louis Lemnitzer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, presented a plan created by the Joint Chiefs to nuke the Soviet Union.

Using the Strategic Air Command (SAC), the United States had the capability to deliver nukes throughout the Soviet Union at a time before the Soviets had any ICBMs capable of striking the United States. General Lemnitzer approved Operation Northwoods which proposed a series of false flag attacks that were intended to pave the way for annihilating Cuba and communism there. This plan followed Operation Mongoose which ended in the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Castro invited the Soviet Union to install missiles to defend Cuba from Washington.

These Soviet weapons were equivalent to American missiles that had been installed in Turkey and were aimed at the Soviet Union. President John Fitzgerald Kennedy nixed the plans of the Joint Chiefs and fired General Lemnitzer who went on to become the Supreme Commander of NATO. Kennedy also fired Allan Dulles who was head of the CIA. Robert F. Kennedy, the Attorney General, delighted in yanking the chain of J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI chief. The Kennedys ridiculed the Vice President, Lyndon Baines Johnson, as "Uncle Cornpone," while assigning him to demeaning tasks that he hated doing and that he felt were beneath an important person like himself. Powerful enemies within the American government assassinated John Kennedy in Dallas in November 1963. Robert Kennedy was assassinated in 1968 by the same interests. Both murders followed templates in the CIA playbook.

Kosygin and Brezhnev replaced Khrushchev after squeezing him out. Castro continued serving Washington's interests as a useful bogeyman for American foreign policy and domestic politics. Lyndon Baines Johnson created the War in Vietnam, gave nuclear weapons technology to Israel, destroyed Nasserism and the pan-Arab movement, and supported the overthrow of Sukarno which required a bloodbath in Indonesia. Millions of Indonesians were slaughtered "to make the world safe for democracy." LBJ made the American military-industrial complex very happy and very rich. Johnson introduced Civil Rights legislation — which, as the "king of the Senate," he had blocked from being enacted. Johnson supported NASA as well as Civil Rights putting a wholesome gloss on his Presidency, November 22, 1963 – January 20, 1969.

As the self-proclaimed "leader of the free world," the United States continued securing its position as world hegemon using high finance, low bribery, assassinations with covert operations, mass media propaganda, rigged elections, coup d'état, and military muscle when necessary.

___________________

MORE CLINTON EVIL

© MMXVI V.1.0.5
by Morley Evans

Aren't ya glad they lost? I am! There is even a local connection right here in Regina, Canada, to the Clintons in Arkansas when Bill was Attorney General and then Governor. This case involves the blood bank and the Canadian Tainted Blood Scandal. Blood is the common denominator. I'll expose it later. Here's more:

As I have looked into cases over the years that have been dismissed, I have found that they are all true. My own cases are true. They were all dismissed. Evidence doesn't matter. The assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK are good places where you can start opening your own eyes. Read all the "conspiracy theory" books. The authors, who know they won't be believed, are very careful to compile mountains of evidence. The Official Story is usually false. It is created by society's leading citizens whose primary concerns are 1). protecting the system and themselves as well as 2). advancing their own positions in the rookery. The truth is usually not a big concern for society's leading citizens. Occasionally it is. Don't count on it.

WAR IS A RACKET

© MMXVI V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

War is a Racket by Smedley Butler is a famous speech denouncing the military industrial complex. This speech by two-time Congressional Medal of Honor recipient exposes war profits that benefit few at the expense of many. Throughout his distinguished career in the Marines, Smedley Darlington Butler demonstrated that true patriotism does not mean blind allegiance to government policies with which one does not agree. To Hell with war.

https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.pdf

 

charlescox8611 months ago

I was in the Marines and we obviously learned plenty about Smedley Butler, but we never
heard of "War is a Racket" and it was never on the Commandant's reading list for any paygrade.

 9  

 

Slave2PaperWithInkOn1 week ago

INCH£$, M£T£R$, MIL£$... ''money.'' NUMB£R$ !!! Do WE - lack em ???

  

 

craigozland19 hours ago

Well of course you didn't hear the full story. Military men are meant to take orders not to think.

_____________________________________

POTUS ELECTION 2016

© MMXVI V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Does Hillary Clinton really deserve to win the election because she won the popular vote? These are the facts. You can decide for yourself.

The keening and caterwauling we’ve been treated to by the left since Hillary Clinton’s defeat has been monumental.

Most entertaining has been the snowflake retreat to “safe spaces” with puppies and coloring books to assuage their anguish.

Less entertaining were the violent protests which
were paid for erupted in cities across the nation.

Putting aside Jill Stein’s quixotic effort to force a recount, the left has been loudest with its demands to dismantle the Electoral College.

After all it’s unfair: Hillary Clinton won the “popular vote” so she should win, right?

Wrong.

Our Founders in their infinite wisdom created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?

The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet and it should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.

Share this with as many whiners as you can.

http://www.con-alerts.com/these-numbers-will-shut-down-liberals-on-electoral-college/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staten_Island

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)

__________________________________