© MMXXI V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans
😱 ATTENTION! 😱
Estimates of “Positive Cases” are
MEANINGLESS
The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis
The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, March 19, 2021
Theme: Science and Medicine
All Global Research articles can be read in 27 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop-down menu on our home page's top banner (Desktop version).
***
The Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020, as a means to detect the SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For further details, see the Drosten Study)
Exactly one year later, on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated.
While the WHO does not deny the validity of their misleading January 2020 guidelines, they recommend “Re-testing” (which everybody knows is an impossibility).
The contentious issue pertains to the number of amplification threshold cycles (Ct). According to Pieter Borger, et al
The number of amplification cycles [should be] less than 35, preferably 25-30 cycles. In the case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detect signals which do not correlate with the infectious virus was determined by isolation in cell culture…(Critique of Drosten Study)
The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.
If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (recommended by the WHO), segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated in the course of the last 14 months are invalid.
According to Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, et al., the Ct > 35 has been the norm “in most laboratories in Europe & the US”.
Below is the WHO’s carefully formulated “Retraction”. The full text with a link to the original document is in the annexe:
No comments:
Post a Comment