Do the Iluminatti really control everything? They want to. They probably think they do. But people keep messing things up. Lenin was supposed to defeat Germany but instead he did what Ludendorf expected: Lenin shut down the eastern front. Then Stalin put an end to Trotsky and the Bolsheviks. Decades later, Putin renationalized Russia's oil industry and dusted off the Soviet nuclear missile fleet. (If one nuke keeps North Korea safe, thousands of Russian nukes keep Russia safe.) Those tricky Russians are so unpredictable. The "A-rabs" have fouled up all the plans that were laid by "the World's only remaining superpower." They did it without an army, or a navy, or an airforce (see below) — just like the Palestinians who have frustrated the Zionists for 130 years. After ignominious defeat in 1945, the Japanese are now the world's leading automaker. The Japanese lead many other sectors too. The Chinese survived destruction of the Chinese Empire and then Maoism and have started on the path pointed out by Deng Xiao Ping. India is booming. Taken as a whole, Europe's GDP is larger than the United States and Europe is a happier place too. In fact, the American hegemony is looking more like yesterday's empire every day — and most people here haven't even recognized yet that there is an American Empire! Even DeBeer's diamond monopoly has competition. Nothing men make lasts forever. The world wide mind control system may be permanently damaged too. Controlling everything is sure tough. It's like handling mercury. Oh yes, handling mercury is hazardous to your health. That's nice to know when you add up the tens of millions who have been killed and the hundreds of millions more who have been made miserable FOR NOTHING by these would be masters of us all. There is justice. "Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small." Good bye, Dick.
http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=11808
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Controlling the "Surplus Population"
In days of yore, the Ruling Classes needed people to serve them.
With modern mechanisms, such as electronic gizmos, the Ruling Classes don't need as many of us as they did during the Civil War days of Albert Pike when darkies picked cotton and — bad news for everyone — the more of us there are, the harder does controlling us become. Reducing the population has always been a preoccupation of the Ruling Classes.
While it is true that their social engineering programs have reduced the birth rate here, there are other problems: Mr. Bush and the Internet seem to have seriously damaged the mind control system that was working so well for years. So it may be necessary to reduce the population further, even here. What can be done with the "surplus population" today? They used to pack us off to the plantations in Virginia and the Caribbean. (I'm talking about white people here.) They sent us to Australia. Some went to (English) Canada. But where would they ship us today?
Of course, we-uns can be incited to wage war against our fellows to keep them in their place (and their numbers down). The Ruling Classes have been using us for centuries to slaughter folks in the less developed nations. Hate works well. Fear-mongering is useful. Naked aggression can be spun into "defence". A superior attitude can be cultivated. Patriotism and honour can easily be perverted. Young men can be bribed with a mere bauble awarded for "valour". Sex and drugs have proven excellent tools to demoralize and destroy the "middle class" and to keep the lower classes in their lower places. June Cleaver, following the advice of Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, became Britney Spears. Bishop Fulton J. Sheen became Rev. John Hagee, or did he become Charlie Sheen? Poor Britney has just hit "Rock Bottom" according to the tabloids. She's totally washed up at 26. Faust became a girl, then she became a woman. "I'm as fat as a pig now!"
There is always famine and pestilence. How does that go? War, Famine, Pestilence and Death — the four horsemen of the Apocalypse. It's the old recipe for population control. But something unexpected may yet surprise the Ruling Classes. They failed to predict the Internet, didn't they? Their war machine created the Internet! Now all sorts of subversive material is being read by millions. Gadzooks! Maybe our Rulers aren't as smart as they think they are.
Let's not be as dumb as they think we are.
With modern mechanisms, such as electronic gizmos, the Ruling Classes don't need as many of us as they did during the Civil War days of Albert Pike when darkies picked cotton and — bad news for everyone — the more of us there are, the harder does controlling us become. Reducing the population has always been a preoccupation of the Ruling Classes.
While it is true that their social engineering programs have reduced the birth rate here, there are other problems: Mr. Bush and the Internet seem to have seriously damaged the mind control system that was working so well for years. So it may be necessary to reduce the population further, even here. What can be done with the "surplus population" today? They used to pack us off to the plantations in Virginia and the Caribbean. (I'm talking about white people here.) They sent us to Australia. Some went to (English) Canada. But where would they ship us today?
Of course, we-uns can be incited to wage war against our fellows to keep them in their place (and their numbers down). The Ruling Classes have been using us for centuries to slaughter folks in the less developed nations. Hate works well. Fear-mongering is useful. Naked aggression can be spun into "defence". A superior attitude can be cultivated. Patriotism and honour can easily be perverted. Young men can be bribed with a mere bauble awarded for "valour". Sex and drugs have proven excellent tools to demoralize and destroy the "middle class" and to keep the lower classes in their lower places. June Cleaver, following the advice of Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, became Britney Spears. Bishop Fulton J. Sheen became Rev. John Hagee, or did he become Charlie Sheen? Poor Britney has just hit "Rock Bottom" according to the tabloids. She's totally washed up at 26. Faust became a girl, then she became a woman. "I'm as fat as a pig now!"
There is always famine and pestilence. How does that go? War, Famine, Pestilence and Death — the four horsemen of the Apocalypse. It's the old recipe for population control. But something unexpected may yet surprise the Ruling Classes. They failed to predict the Internet, didn't they? Their war machine created the Internet! Now all sorts of subversive material is being read by millions. Gadzooks! Maybe our Rulers aren't as smart as they think they are.
Let's not be as dumb as they think we are.
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
Why Are We At War?
The War on Terror is not about securing U.S. access to oil, as the
article below clearly indicates. It is not even about securing the
world's access to oil. It is not about avenging unprovoked aggression.
It is not about freeing Muslim women and children. It is not about
spreading democracy. It is not even about securing American hegemony
since it has likely fatally wounded that. So what the heck is it
about? At the most the War on Terror is about smashing Islam, one of
the few remaining obstacles to establishing the New World Order since
Judaism and Christianity have been smashed (look at all those empty
pews) and Hinduism, Confucianism and Buddhism don't matter. The only
faith allowed inside Israel is the Bahai Faith which must not be seen
as a threat to The New World Order by the people who run "Israel"
— who are no friends of the Jews, or the Muslims, or the Christians.
One need only look at what they have done inside "Israel" itself to see
what is in store for everyone else if they succeed. The U.S. is not, nor has
it ever been, in the business of protecting the weak and defenceless. We
believe that but it is a lie, a big lie. Let's not forget that our "leaders" like
war (it makes them feel important), as do war profiteers (it makes them rich).
But they are just a sideshow.
http://antiwar.com/pena/?articleid=11639
Perhaps the money masters feel the U.S.A. is no longer useful. Is the U.S. being discarded as Great Britain was discarded 50 years ago? Perhaps the money masters are not really in control of what is happening. Study the article above. What lies ahead for us, we who will soon be living in yesterday's empire? Perhaps a benign hand is at work after all. Let's hope it is, even if we don't deserve it.
article below clearly indicates. It is not even about securing the
world's access to oil. It is not about avenging unprovoked aggression.
It is not about freeing Muslim women and children. It is not about
spreading democracy. It is not even about securing American hegemony
since it has likely fatally wounded that. So what the heck is it
about? At the most the War on Terror is about smashing Islam, one of
the few remaining obstacles to establishing the New World Order since
Judaism and Christianity have been smashed (look at all those empty
pews) and Hinduism, Confucianism and Buddhism don't matter. The only
faith allowed inside Israel is the Bahai Faith which must not be seen
as a threat to The New World Order by the people who run "Israel"
— who are no friends of the Jews, or the Muslims, or the Christians.
One need only look at what they have done inside "Israel" itself to see
what is in store for everyone else if they succeed. The U.S. is not, nor has
it ever been, in the business of protecting the weak and defenceless. We
believe that but it is a lie, a big lie. Let's not forget that our "leaders" like
war (it makes them feel important), as do war profiteers (it makes them rich).
But they are just a sideshow.
http://antiwar.com/pena/?articleid=11639
Perhaps the money masters feel the U.S.A. is no longer useful. Is the U.S. being discarded as Great Britain was discarded 50 years ago? Perhaps the money masters are not really in control of what is happening. Study the article above. What lies ahead for us, we who will soon be living in yesterday's empire? Perhaps a benign hand is at work after all. Let's hope it is, even if we don't deserve it.
Saturday, September 29, 2007
Is there really is a Conspiracy?
Yes, Virginia, there really is a Conspiracy. Here's a montage, a collage:
The Illuminati? Are they for real? What happened to the super rich of the 18th and 19th century? You know, the ones who built and owned the Suez Canal. Did the Rothschilds lose their money in the crash of '29? The Anglo Persian Oil Company is still around. So is Standard Oil. They are BP and Exxon today. Shell still sells gasoline. J.P. Morgan is still around too. (Morgan once bailed out the United States.) So is the N. M. Rothschild Bank still around. The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) is still around too. It was started by a Scot and is owned by people in The City of London. The Oppenheimers in South Africa still own Anglo American Mining (It owns Hudson's Bay Mining and Smelting in Flin Flon) and DeBeers (which they inherited from Cecil Rhodes). Where did Rhodes get his money? Where did Rockefeller get his money? Where did Guggenheim get his money? Where did Morgan and Shiff get their money? Where did Bronfman get his money? Oppenheimer reputedly financed Rupert Murdock who owns one of the largest world-wide media empires. Conrad Black was part of that racket, but he made a few mistakes. It is never wise to believe your own bullshit. Russian oil fell into Rothschild hands under Boris Yeltsin; Putin nationalized it again. Are these people still around? Why don't we hear about them any more? How do we learn about things? Oh, we get our information from the world wide brainwashing system -- which they own. By the way, the "Stars and Stripes" is really the gridiron flag of the BEIC (British East India Company) with a blue and white device in the canton. That's why the U.S.A. leaped out of the egg fully formed when it became "independent". The American founding fathers had backers with money and experience. Their backers were already busy raping and plundering the Far East. (One quarter of Chinese men had become their customers — as opium addicts!) The canton in the flag made by "Betsy Ross" looks like the European Union flag of today. Are graphic designers and heraldists bereft of imagination? Probably not.
The conspiracy? Do oil and Israel have anything to do with current U.S. foreign policy? Have you heard of Kellogg Brown and Root, Haliburton, and Dick Cheney? Does the newly completed Israeli Supreme Court look like a Masonic Temple? Did Rothschild money build it? Who is Blackwater? What is Blackwater?
- Morley
P.S.: The Rothschilds (that's German for Red Shield as in Roth Schild) didn't lose anything in 1929, but Winston Churchill did. He was bailed out by some bankers of the Zionist stripe. Churchill was no stranger to the Zionists at the time he was bailed out. Winston Churchill's father, Lord Randolf, was "Natty" Rothschild's best friend. Was "Natty" Randolf's best friend too? Winston's mother, Jennie, was a Jew, at least on her father's side http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennie_Jerome#Marriage_and_adultery. Does the conspiracy "control" everything? No, but the conspirators do their best. They make mistakes like everyone and, like everyone, they are just trying to make a living after all. They are only human, even if they are working for the devil. Sumner Redstone is the owner of another giant world-wide media empire that includes Viacom and CBS: (Red_Stone = "Roth_Stein"). That used to be his name. Get it? As bad as the media was, it's worse now. Tom Brokaw, retired. Dan Rather, fired. Peter Jennings, died. CNN was good when it was started. Then the media moguls bought it. Now it's as bad as the others. But we have the Internet. Thank God. We are lucky people.
The Illuminati? Are they for real? What happened to the super rich of the 18th and 19th century? You know, the ones who built and owned the Suez Canal. Did the Rothschilds lose their money in the crash of '29? The Anglo Persian Oil Company is still around. So is Standard Oil. They are BP and Exxon today. Shell still sells gasoline. J.P. Morgan is still around too. (Morgan once bailed out the United States.) So is the N. M. Rothschild Bank still around. The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) is still around too. It was started by a Scot and is owned by people in The City of London. The Oppenheimers in South Africa still own Anglo American Mining (It owns Hudson's Bay Mining and Smelting in Flin Flon) and DeBeers (which they inherited from Cecil Rhodes). Where did Rhodes get his money? Where did Rockefeller get his money? Where did Guggenheim get his money? Where did Morgan and Shiff get their money? Where did Bronfman get his money? Oppenheimer reputedly financed Rupert Murdock who owns one of the largest world-wide media empires. Conrad Black was part of that racket, but he made a few mistakes. It is never wise to believe your own bullshit. Russian oil fell into Rothschild hands under Boris Yeltsin; Putin nationalized it again. Are these people still around? Why don't we hear about them any more? How do we learn about things? Oh, we get our information from the world wide brainwashing system -- which they own. By the way, the "Stars and Stripes" is really the gridiron flag of the BEIC (British East India Company) with a blue and white device in the canton. That's why the U.S.A. leaped out of the egg fully formed when it became "independent". The American founding fathers had backers with money and experience. Their backers were already busy raping and plundering the Far East. (One quarter of Chinese men had become their customers — as opium addicts!) The canton in the flag made by "Betsy Ross" looks like the European Union flag of today. Are graphic designers and heraldists bereft of imagination? Probably not.
The conspiracy? Do oil and Israel have anything to do with current U.S. foreign policy? Have you heard of Kellogg Brown and Root, Haliburton, and Dick Cheney? Does the newly completed Israeli Supreme Court look like a Masonic Temple? Did Rothschild money build it? Who is Blackwater? What is Blackwater?
- Morley
P.S.: The Rothschilds (that's German for Red Shield as in Roth Schild) didn't lose anything in 1929, but Winston Churchill did. He was bailed out by some bankers of the Zionist stripe. Churchill was no stranger to the Zionists at the time he was bailed out. Winston Churchill's father, Lord Randolf, was "Natty" Rothschild's best friend. Was "Natty" Randolf's best friend too? Winston's mother, Jennie, was a Jew, at least on her father's side http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennie_Jerome#Marriage_and_adultery. Does the conspiracy "control" everything? No, but the conspirators do their best. They make mistakes like everyone and, like everyone, they are just trying to make a living after all. They are only human, even if they are working for the devil. Sumner Redstone is the owner of another giant world-wide media empire that includes Viacom and CBS: (Red_Stone = "Roth_Stein"). That used to be his name. Get it? As bad as the media was, it's worse now. Tom Brokaw, retired. Dan Rather, fired. Peter Jennings, died. CNN was good when it was started. Then the media moguls bought it. Now it's as bad as the others. But we have the Internet. Thank God. We are lucky people.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Flags and Symbols
Here is the well-known flag of the United States of America which was designed in 1776 by Betsy Ross for George Washington, so they say:

Here is the not-so-well-known flag of the British East India Company that was used from 1707 to 1858 when the union flag in the canton was updated to the form it has today:

Could the U.S. flag and what it represents have anything to do with the people who were running the BEIC? People don't usually adopt symbols used by people they don't like. Do they? What did the BEIC stand for? Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness? Didn't Americans rebel over tea and taxes? Or was the war for independence really about something else? Did Betsy Ross really design the flag? What was the Grand Union Flag? What was the first flag of the United States Navy?
There are so many unanswered questions…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_United_States#First_flag

Here is the not-so-well-known flag of the British East India Company that was used from 1707 to 1858 when the union flag in the canton was updated to the form it has today:

Could the U.S. flag and what it represents have anything to do with the people who were running the BEIC? People don't usually adopt symbols used by people they don't like. Do they? What did the BEIC stand for? Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness? Didn't Americans rebel over tea and taxes? Or was the war for independence really about something else? Did Betsy Ross really design the flag? What was the Grand Union Flag? What was the first flag of the United States Navy?
There are so many unanswered questions…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_United_States#First_flag
Sunday, September 9, 2007
A Radical View
Consider this possibility: Is it possible that nothing we are told by our leaders is true? Yes, it is true. It is demonstrably true. Not one word they utter today is true. Not one word they have uttered in the past was true. Should they tell you the time, you had better check to see they haven't stolen your watch. No one is trying to kill us or take away our "freedoms" — except them, our leaders. They promise to make us safe, by enslaving us. They claim we must follow their orders and go out to kill people they have told us are our enemies. Of course, they don't ask us to follow them. No, they will be safe and sound at home counting their money while we are "over there" killing our enemies. Are those people over there our enemies? Or, are we their enemies? Why? Are our leaders at fault because they have deceived us? Or are we at fault because we let them do it?
Radical (comparative more radical, superlative most radical)
Of or pertaining to the root or root cause of the matter.
Thorough going or fundamental.
Favouring fundamental change, or change at the root cause of the matter.
Latin = radix: source, root, foundation.
Radical (comparative more radical, superlative most radical)
Of or pertaining to the root or root cause of the matter.
Thorough going or fundamental.
Favouring fundamental change, or change at the root cause of the matter.
Latin = radix: source, root, foundation.
Friday, August 24, 2007
A Policy of Unremitting Force? Us?
Comment to Lew Rockwell on his artice: http://www.mises.org/story/2690
Dear Lew,
Amen.
We are supposed to believe that the wogs have always been killing each other and that we must "stay the course" to prevent civil war as we guide the heathens down the path toward civilization. Sounds pretty noble, doesn't it? We are noble if we are anything, that's for sure. But people should ask themselves how these native combatants managed to live together for six hundred years when they were part of the Ottoman Empire. Were the Turks so vicious that no one dared to step out of line? Do Iraqis now misbehave only because we are such nice guys? Could be …
Or, perhaps the troubles started when the Ottoman Empire was destroyed, dismembered and looted, from WW I to today — by us! (We? Actually, I didn't have anything to do with it and neither did you, I'm sure, Lew. But you know what I mean.)
I think the record shows that things were quite peaceful throughout the region when the Ottomans ran things in Mesopotamia, just as they were peaceful in the Balkans and also in Iberia when the Moors ran things there. Why, after Constantinople became Istanbul, the Orthodox Christian Church HQ stayed just where it had always been — in Istanbul. And the Jews lived there and in Sarajevo too. [And in Baghdad and in Cairo!] Fancy that. If that is true, then it suggests that we are the problem, not them. That ominously suggests that someone other than them is responsible for all those nasty suicide bombings we see killing the natives by the hundreds every week. Maybe it's us, or our agents. Maybe the real plan is to drive everyone out of Iraq, or kill them if they refuse to leave. It would be unthinkable to think something like that.
Of course that couldn't be true. We are the good guys, after all. Aren't we? Sure we are.
- Morley Evans
Dear Lew,
Amen.
We are supposed to believe that the wogs have always been killing each other and that we must "stay the course" to prevent civil war as we guide the heathens down the path toward civilization. Sounds pretty noble, doesn't it? We are noble if we are anything, that's for sure. But people should ask themselves how these native combatants managed to live together for six hundred years when they were part of the Ottoman Empire. Were the Turks so vicious that no one dared to step out of line? Do Iraqis now misbehave only because we are such nice guys? Could be …
Or, perhaps the troubles started when the Ottoman Empire was destroyed, dismembered and looted, from WW I to today — by us! (We? Actually, I didn't have anything to do with it and neither did you, I'm sure, Lew. But you know what I mean.)
I think the record shows that things were quite peaceful throughout the region when the Ottomans ran things in Mesopotamia, just as they were peaceful in the Balkans and also in Iberia when the Moors ran things there. Why, after Constantinople became Istanbul, the Orthodox Christian Church HQ stayed just where it had always been — in Istanbul. And the Jews lived there and in Sarajevo too. [And in Baghdad and in Cairo!] Fancy that. If that is true, then it suggests that we are the problem, not them. That ominously suggests that someone other than them is responsible for all those nasty suicide bombings we see killing the natives by the hundreds every week. Maybe it's us, or our agents. Maybe the real plan is to drive everyone out of Iraq, or kill them if they refuse to leave. It would be unthinkable to think something like that.
Of course that couldn't be true. We are the good guys, after all. Aren't we? Sure we are.
- Morley Evans
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)