Letter to Dr. Judy

© MMX V.1.1.0
by Morley Evans

Ambrose I. Lane, Sr.

Dear Dr. Judy,

While reviewing some of your interviews, I noticed that Ambrose I. Lane, Sr. had been fired the day after his last interview with you. I wasn't able to find that story again. I'll have to check my history log to find it. What I did find were stories that he had died on September 15, 2010 at 75 years of age. What? That was last week! It didn't make the news here in Canada. I am sorry to see him gone. I had just discovered him.

I bought a few things today from your website. drjudywood.com

I've been wandering around your website looking at the evidence. From what I can tell, all the buildings were destroyed, not just WTC 1 & 2 and 7. The top floors of WTC 1 & 2 were damaged and on fire. Then they were turned into micro dust. How? I don't know. Only the people who did it know. Was it Pashtun tribesmen in Afghanistan? Mullah Omar, Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, Ali Baba and the forty thieves, or Aladdin and his magic lamp?


Probably not.


For a few seconds, after "dustification", the twin towers retained their form, then they disintegrated spectacularly. The remnants of the central core of WTC 1 survived for a few seconds after its tower disintegrated. Then they too disintegrated before our eyes as an excellent example of what happened to both towers. It wasn't smoke. It was dust. Most of the material formed a huge dust cloud that floated off on the breezes to settle over lower Manhattan and its waterways. Some was carried off far away on the upper winds. WTC 7 dropped silently a few hours later. It is no exaggeration to say it disappeared. "Poof." WTC 3 (the Marriott Hotel) is gone. WTC 6 had a huge hole bored down in the middle of the building. I don't know what happened to WTC 4 and 5. They may have been removed. The bathtub is intact and keeps out the Hudson River still. They have been trucking out something for years. What?

The process that turned steel, concrete, offices and people to dust continued long after the initial destruction. Dust was pervasive. It rose from sidewalks and parking lots far from the towers. The process may be continuing today, nine years after the attack. The dust that didn't drift away seems to have turned into dirt. What is this dirt? It looks like potting soil. Workers were hosing down the WTC from day one. They were still doing it years later. Trucks were busy moving dirt in and hauling dirt out. What have they been doing?

On this ninth anniversary of 9/11, I had assumed that they finished removing the rubble and cleaning up the site years ago. As you have noted, they removed most of the rubble and sent it to China only a few minutes after the buildings had collapsed. Those American workers are certainly productive! Wow. Who could compete with American workers? Has anyone asked these workers what they are, and were, doing down there everyday for years? Whatever else the workers have been doing, they have been busy destroying the crime scene every day since the crime was committed nine years ago.

Apparently there were no nukes, no radiation, no molten pools of metal, no Vesuvius-like pyroclastic flow like the one that entombed Herculaneum in AD 79 (the huge cloud was not hot but it did look like a volcanic cloud), no seismic footprint. There were strange things everywhere like toasted cars as far away as a mile and a half, flipped cars, missing engine blocks, bright orange rust, fires that weren't fire but looked like fire, leaves left on trees standing beside destroyed cars. There was paper everywhere. Why was paper not turned into dust? Why was paper not on fire that was lying on the pavement beside cars that were on fire? There were few people to treat or bury! Where were they? The media mourns the lives lost, but never asks this question. We were originally told that tens of thousands of people worked every day at the WTC. Hospitals and doctors were ready. They say that fewer than 3,000 were killed. It was a regular working day. Where were they?


The WTC was stuffed with telephones. It was a global communications hub. Why don't we have a record of what the people in the towers were saying? We know people were there, we could see them walking around inside WTC 1 and waving to us through the hole that was supposedly made by a Boeing which set the place on fire. Why were they silent? Why weren't they on fire? Were the phones disconnected? Did they not have a cell phone?

Hurricane Erin was stuffed into the Memory Hole. As far as everyone knows, it was a clear beautiful day in New York on Tuesday 11 September 2001. The residents of "the media capital of the world" don't know that a huge hurricane raged right on their doorstep. You, yourself, have been working for years on 9/11 and I discovered you only a few days ago. The Memory Hole works well, but it isn't perfect. It took nine years, but I found out about you and what you have to say!

I have gotten used to the lying media, but I am still surprised by this. I have been getting my news from Internet sources now for years. I can see what is not reported and what most people are unaware of. People who are the best informed by the main stream media are the worst informed. Well informed people know less than a hermit living in the woods would know after talking to chipmunks. The event of 9/11 convinces me that we are trapped in a psyop. Neither Gobbles nor the Politburo could dream of mind control as complete as we have here in the Free World. Was 9/11 only a bad dream? We could ask the survivors who were found down in the Warner Brothers store under one of the towers. We could ask Bugs Bunny, Foghorn or the Roadrunner. They survived without a scratch. Thank you for your work, Dr. Judy Wood!

- Morley

http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/GH/GH_carcrash.html
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/AJ/touchhand.html

Roadrunner Physics

© MMX V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

This computer animation of a Boeing crashing into WTC 1 is certainly ingenious, but it is a fantasy. It is not "scientific" at all. How does light aluminum cut through heavy structural steel members on the outer walls? (They were not a "facade".) How does the disintegrating aluminum airplane cut through the massive steel and concrete central core? How do the remnant scraps of the aluminum Boeing cut through the exterior structural steel wall on the other side? This animation is much more ambitious than the animations millions watched on TV on September 11, 2001, but it is a fantasy nevertheless. It may look convincing, but it is ridiculous! The official story is a joke! That the officials think they can get away with it tells us how dumb they think we are. Are they right? How dumb are you?

VERITAS Dr. Judy Wood

© MMX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Type "Judy Wood" into the YouTube search box to get all her videos.

Dr. Judy Wood

© MMX V.1.0.8
by Morley Evans

I was wrong.

Mini nukes did not blow up the World Trade Center (WTC). One look at the completely undamaged seven storey basement area and the undamaged "bathtub" which still protects the WTC from being flooded by the Hudson River, disproves the mini nuke hypothesis.

Something blew up the WTC. It wasn't Thermate or dynamite and blasting caps, either. One look at the tremendous explosive force disproves all such ideas. The Big Boeing official story is just a joke. "But I saw the planes with my own eyes." You watched a TV show along with millions of others. Sorry, you are mistaken.

Dr. Judy Wood has collected thousands of photos which clearly show what did not happen, namely, none of the above. They also show phenomena that indicate exotic forces were at work. They look like something from The Twilight Zone. The 9/11 TV show was fake. These photos are real and they are bizarre.

Go here: www.drjudywood.com to see the evidence. It will blow your mind. Dr. Judy's book Where Did The Towers Go? will be released soon.

Before reading further, Dr. Judy Wood states, "It is not my position that '9/11 was or wasn't an inside job.' I am a scientist, not a conspiracy theorist or a politician."

Yet, from the evidence one can infer that directed energy weapons — or something — were used to destroy the WTC. What exactly? We don't know exactly, whatever it was can't be purchased at the local gun shoppe. It would have been created by the military industrial complex of "the world's only remaining superpower." It was not created and used by Pashtun tribesmen in Afghanistan, or Saddam Hussein, or the Saudi royal family or Osama bin Laden. The Iranians had nothing to do with it.

It was not created and used by SPECTRE, or Dr. Evil, or the Russians.

How do we know? In the movies, an evil force holds the world at ransom by threatening terror if its demands are not met. The ransom demand was delivered by George W. Bush when he addressed the joint session of Congress after 9/11. "You are either with us, or you are with the terrorists."

With these words, Bush proclaimed, "All power to us." He might as well have said, "We want a gazillion dollars," like Dr. Evil in the Austin Powers movies. A gazillion dollars would come a few years later with the world-wide financial meltdown when they started printing money at an even faster rate than they had been printing it before. Can global hyperinflation be far behind?

That night, George W. Bush, who was fond of calling himself, "the most powerful man in the world," launched the greatest power grab yet in American history. That night, top members of the American power élite sat in Congress licking their chops as they anticipated getting even more.

This story is not over.

Speeding Bullet

© MMX V.1.0.0

by Morley Evans









What do you think would happen if a 50 caliber bullet were fired at a structural steel I beam?

(The great big one on the right is the 50 caliber bullet.)

1). Would it pass right through like a hot knife cutting through warm butter?
2). Would it be squashed and bounce off?

What do you think would happen if an aluminum soda can smashed into a structural steel I beam? What about an airplane, or a jetliner which is essentially like an aluminum soda can and flies much slower than a bullet?

Capturing the Atom Bomb

© MMX V.1.0.8
by Morley Evans

The United States created a secret film crew to film atomic bomb tests. These have been declassified and are now available to the public. As it watches, the public may be terrorized again, as it was in the 1950s and 1960s and 1970s and 1980s during the Cold War. What if these terrible weapons fall into the hands of terrorists?? The public may seek safety as is promised by our leaders. Today, nuclear weapons are in the hands of the United States, Great Britain, France, Russia, China, North Korea, India, Israel and Pakistan.

Consider this possibility: our leaders in the British-American empire are the terrorists and we are their primary victims. That couldn't be true, you say? I could be true. Consider the possibility that we are the most bamboozled population in history. Wake up! Don't be fooled again. Who created these weapons? Was it the enemy? Which enemy?

You probably believe that all the "defense" we have was and is required to make you safe from bad people like the Boers, the Spanish, the Filipinos, the Germans, the Austrians, the Hungarians, the Ottomans, the Japanese, the Russians, the Chinese, the Koreans, the Vietnamese, the Laotians, the Cambodians, the Argentines, the Cubans, the Guatemalans, the Nicaraguans, the Panamanians, the Grenadines, the Lebanese, the Libyans, the Serbians, the Syrians, the Iraqis, the Afghans, and the Iranians. That pretty much covers the 20th Century. We had other enemies in the 19th Century and the British and Americans briefly were enemies in the 18th Century, but we got together again for more world domination. Did you know that from 1066 to 1814, our enemy, most of the time, was France?

Who is always most safe? Our leaders or you? That's right! Our leaders! They are important, you aren't (as important). Maybe you aren't important at all (to them).

Are you safe?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/09/14/science/20100914_atom.html?ref=science
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/14/science/14atom.html?_r=1&ref=us

Watch clips here:
http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/films/testfilms.aspx

Order films here:
http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/forms/testfilm.htm

Sleep Away by Bob Acri

© MMX V.1.0.0



Here's something beautiful and wonderful.

One American Speaks

© MMX V.1.0.0

New York online journalist, poet and conspiracy theorist Jerry Mazza joined RT to share his ideas on 9/11, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - and the effects they've had on the American psyche.

Love Your Neighbour as Yourself

© MMX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

http://www.twopaths.com/jneighbr.htm

A Beautiful Adhaan

© MMX V.1.0.0

Muslims Are Not The Enemy

© MMX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Christians and Jews are being enlisted by heretics and Luciferians to destroy the world. Do not be mislead by people who are your enemies and the enemies of mankind. Muslims are not the enemy. Listen to what you are being told. Are you being asked to hasten the End of the World? Who is telling you this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmSY86tMFw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaCcbS2b4PI&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALxA3TV3xGQ&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CJE62uks0Y&feature=related

WTC Demolition

© MMX V.1.2.2
by Morley Evans

The CBC replayed "102 Minutes That Changed the World" last night. In my opinion the documentary illustrates how worthless eye witness testimony really is. Anyone who thinks he or she knows what happened "because I was there" has no idea what happened. Mass confusion reigned for 102 minutes. I do not think any planes hit any buildings. What people watched from the ground were "special effects" created with explosives and Thermate. An aluminum soda pop can cannot penetrate a tank or even a Brinks armoured truck. It doesn't matter how fast it is flying. If it could, we'd better tell the Army. What millions watched on TV was a TV show. Many people inside the towers found out what was happening from the TV broadcast. The coup de grâce was almost certainly delivered by a mini nuke in the basement of each building. Nothing else could reduce the buildings to dust in a few seconds. Although the meagre remnants of the buildings were shipped off as scrap to New Jersey, India and Africa, some evidence of three thermonuclear events will remain for a long time. I wonder if I could go to 9/11 Ground Zero and start poking around? I couldn't? Why not? 

Never mind. Others have poked around.

YOU SHOULD START HERE: Modern Thermonuclear Demolition

Videos for "102 Minutes That Changed the World"

Do mini nukes exist? Fifty years ago, the U.S. Army demonstrated small-yield tactical nuclear weapons to Robert Kennedy and other big wigs at the nuclear test range in Nevada. These bombs were small enough to be lifted by one man. Our weapons industry has not been idle the past half century. They are industrious. They are an industry. More and better weapons exist today. Furthermore, explosions can be directed so no blast goes into undesired areas. This is clearly demonstrated by the US Army Claymore landmine with its inscription FRONT TOWARD ENEMY. The mine is flat. All blast goes in one direction only. All blast drives steel pellets forward to kill the enemy. None goes behind, or up or down. In the case of the WTC, each blast was vertical with a focus of 1,000 feet.

A sequence of timed detonations on various levels in WTC 1 & 2 would ensure the buildings would appear to fall straight down. Boob, boom, boom, boom, boom is what a fireman says he heard when he was trapped — yet safe — in a stairway at the bottom of one of the towers. He was rescued and survived to tell the tale. Perhaps his story is disinformation, as might be the testimony of the President of Controlled Demolition, Inc. who has stated that conventional controlled demolition did not demolish the WTC. That is true. It did not. The towers were vapourized and turned into dust. Poof!

The thesis of this essay is that the WTC was blown up. It did not collapse. After you look at the evidence, you can decide for yourself.

M18 Claymore anti-personnel mine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)

Videos for davy crockett nuke

The large section of the South Tower that appears ready to fall in the photo above did not fall. It was photographed at the instant it was vapourized just before it turned into dust along with the rest of the building. The dots in the photo above it are pieces of the very heavy outer steel wall. Each dot weighed tons. They did not reach the ground. They were photographed moments before they turned into dust and floated off on the breezes. Everyone saw the enormous dust cloud. Great explosive force was required to produce the effect that you can see. Jet fuel (which is kerosene), dynamite and Thermate cannot do this no matter how hard you try. People who say, "Don't believe your eyes, believe me," are lying.

The WTC buildings did not collapse. They were blown up. Gigantic steel columns, reinforced concrete, office furniture and people were sublimated into microscopic dust particles. Huge clouds of this dust floated off on the breezes and settled as dust all over lower Manhattan and its waterways. Virtually nothing of these huge buildings was left on the sight of "Ground Zero". Where did they go? Duh. Open your eyes!

This video shows remnants of the central core of the North Tower (WTC 1) standing momentarily then disintegrating to dust right before your eyes. Poof! This is an excellent example of what happened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dWBBEtA5bI&NR=1

Here are the blueprints of the WTC towers 1 & 2

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/blueprints.html

Here is some footage shown on ABC. This first segment is apparently a candid shot of a fireman out on the street for some unknown reason. Then the camera turns 90° and up to zero in on WTC 1 just in time to catch the "first jetliner" crashing into WTC 1. It passes through the steel wall like a hot knife slicing through butter. This is shown in close up in a later segment. Another "candid" segment taken from an extremely low angle shows the right side of a man's face with WTC 2 in the background. The camera just happened to be in position to catch the "second jetliner" slicing into WTC 2 and exploding out the side of the tower. Again, the plane cuts through the steel walls like a hot knife cutting though butter. While there would have been reason to watch and film the towers after the "first jetliner" had been reported as having caused a gigantic hole in WTC 1, there was no reason to film WTC 1 before something had been reported. Airplanes are not necessary to cause the damage that everyone could see. Explosives would certainly cause the damage whereas planes would not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fH7c8H6SNw&feature=related

Larry Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Centre, benefitted enormously from its destruction. The WTC had a large vacancy rate as well as a looming asbestos removal problem that would have cost a fortune to solve. Larry got lucky. Larry Silverstein even sued his insurance company so he could double his money! What a lucky guy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein#World_Trade_Center

WTC post demolition examination:

http://letsrollforums.com/update-us-government-s-t22024.html?t=22024

Conspiracy? Yes, indeed! It's not a theory.

http://vodpod.com/watch/3038656-new-911-photos-prove-wtc-exploded-from-inside

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=73&contentid=4255

http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/soldier5.htm

The uncomfortable fact is that these demolitions could not have been carried out by the people we are told carried them out. Aluminum airplanes could not penetrate the outer structural steel walls of WTC 1 & 2 or their super-strong floors that reinforced the structure. The huge concrete and steel central core of each tower disappeared! The supposed pilots could not have flown the supposed airliners. Outsiders did not have access to the WTC complex. (The brother of George W. Bush, Marvin Bush, and his security contractors had full access for months.) The accused do not have nuclear weapons. Yet people in Muslim countries are blamed for 9/11 and we have been raising Hell, destroying their countries and killing them for nine years. Many believe this is justice. Do you?

If the accused didn't do it, who did? You know the answer. Don't you.

The planes? What about the planes? The planes were loaded with explosives, boarded by unsuspecting passengers and crew, hijacked electronically, flown out over the Atlantic and detonated. The planes everyone saw on TV were fairly simple computer animations. Footage was fed to the TV networks which broadcast the lie to millions world-wide.

Don't the people responsible care about the 3,000 who were killed at the WTC? Do they care about the hundreds of thousands who have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan? Do they care about the Lebanese or the Palestinians who have been dispossessed and killed? They do not care about them and they do not care about you either. So wake up.

WTC first responders

Iraq's Resting Places

Bank of North Dakota

© MMX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

Various things have been done in various places to help people deal with economic uncertainty. Across the American border from Saskatchewan lies North Dakota. Could anyone learn anything from them? Here's an article in Mother Jones:

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2009/03/how-nation’s-only-state-owned-bank-became-envy-wall-street

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_North_Dakota
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/16/bank-of-north-dakotasocia_n_463522.html

Take a look.

Makeup

© MMX V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

Feminists started promoting no makeup in the sixties. They burned their bras and wore flat shoes with plaid flannel shirts. Some wore hair shirts too, I suppose. Makeup definitely is used by women to make themselves attractive. Beauty has power. Beauty is bewitching. A beautiful young girl is powerful. She knows it. That is how it is. That is how it has always been. Her power is fleeting. Cosmetic companies advertise their products with gorgeous models who look like they are nineteen years old. They look like they are nineteen years old because they are nineteen years old! The suggestion is that women who use the cosmetics they see advertised will look nineteen too. They won't of course. Fifty and sixty year-old women cannot look nineteen. Thirty-year-old women don't look nineteen. Women know that. They aren't stupid. Yet they keep buying makeup and plastering it on every morning. Many women say at least they don't have to shave. They think that shaving every morning would be much harder than putting on makeup. I don't shave every morning, myself. My face needs a rest at least once a week. Men do what they do to please women. Women do what they do to please men. Men make women what they are and women make men what they are. That is how it is. That is how it has always been. Some men used to grow bushy beards in the nineteenth century. Women do not like facial hair. They probably didn't like facial hair then. Many men shaved with straight razors. Gillette has done very well since the safety razor was invented, but sixty-year-old men do not look nineteen, or thirty, even with a close shave. Ah, well.

I smile at girls. They smile back. They make life worth living!

I say, "Thank you!"

They say, "Thank you!"

Life is good!

- Morley

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_razor