© MMX V1.0.2
by Morley Evans
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, M.D. is a scientist. He understands statistics and how they are misused. He likes the Lyon Diet Heart Study because it was an honest scientific study. The entire body of "evidence" being promoted by the anti-cholesterol industry is dead wrong.
I am living proof of what Dr. Kendrick says. My cholesterol is 9.4 mmol/L. Before doctors lowered my cholesterol with Statins, tortured me for 8 years and nearly killed me, my cholesterol was 9.4 mmol/L. Read "The Great Cholesterol Con" by Dr. Kendrick. Why would anyone want to reduce cholesterol? ANSWER from Big Pharma: Because we make lots of money selling Statin drugs! We have made hundreds of billions, even trillions of dollars selling Statin drugs.
http://www.amazon.com/Great-Cholesterol-Con-Really-Disease/dp/1844543609
Here is a summary of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4655
These are a few points:
What is the Lyon Diet Heart Study?
This was a randomized, controlled trial with free-living subjects. Its goal was to test the effectiveness of a Mediterranean-type diet on the rate of coronary events in people who've had a first heart attack. The results suggest that a Mediterranean-style Step I diet may help reduce recurrent events in patients with heart disease.
What is a Mediterranean-style diet?
There's no one, typical "Mediterranean" diet. At least 16 countries border the Mediterranean Sea. Diets vary between these countries and also between regions within a country. Many differences in culture, ethnic background, religion, economy and agricultural production result in different diets. But the common Mediterranean dietary pattern has these characteristics:
• high in fruits, vegetables, bread and other cereals, potatoes, beans, nuts and seeds
• includes olive oil as an important source of monounsaturated fat
• dairy products, fish and poultry consumed in low to moderate amounts, little red meat
• eggs consumed zero to four times weekly
• wine consumed in low to moderate amounts
What are the conclusions?
The Lyon Diet Heart Study showed the potential importance of a dietary pattern that emphasizes fruits, vegetables, breads and cereals, and fish as well as alpha-linolenic acid. The findings from this study imply risk factors beyond lipids and lipoproteins (cholesterol) that have been our primary focus in secondary prevention. The fact that omega-3 fatty acids exert cardioprotective effects in several ways suggests that they could have accounted for the results that were observed. The reduction in coronary recurrence rates, even though lipid and lipoprotein risk factors were comparable, clearly points to other important risk factor changes as major influences in the development of CVD. There's a pressing need to identify these risk factor(s) and find effective treatment strategies.
Dr. Kendrick completely demolishes the hypothesis that lipids and lipoproteins ("cholesterol") have anything to do with atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease and heart attacks. Elevated cholesterol seems to protect one from stroke and cancer. As the American Heart Association concludes above, "There's a pressing need to identify these [other important risk factor changes] and find effective treatment strategies."
Indeed there is a need.
morleyevans@morleyevans.com
www.morleyevansjuiceplus.com
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query kendrick. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query kendrick. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
The Great Cholesterol Con
© MMX V.1.0.5
by Morley Evans
The Great Cholesterol Con by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is splendid! Kendrick is funny as well as insightful.
After demolishing conventional theory about diet and heart, paying particular attention to cholesterol, Dr. Kendrick concludes that Statin drugs are of no use to women or to men who do not have heart disease -- according to the studies that everyone has used to build the anti-cholesterol empire which has earned hundreds of billions of dollars for some pharmaceutical companies. The conclusions that have been reached are contradicted by the studies themselves. What has happened has all been driven by vast amounts of money. Statins benefit fewer than 5% of the population and for them Statins can only add a few months to their lives if they already have heart disease, according to the studies. This benefit is due to something other than lowering cholesterol, but what? Detracting from nebulous benefits are a superabundance of side-effects. A vast financial empire cannot be built on a foundation like that. Now, can it?
(This leads us to the uncomfortable realization that someone is lying, doesn't it? Can vast numbers of experts be lying? Yes, they can. This is exactly the same phenomenon as Global Warming which is also a vast industry powered by vast amounts of money that has corrupted vast numbers of academics while enriching pseudoscientists like Al Gore, who is a politician, not a scientist, and David Suzuki, who is a broadcaster, not a scientist. Even the Nobel Committee has been corrupted, imagine!)
Dr. Kendrick makes the case that heart disease is created by unhealthy stressors which lead to HPA-axis dysfunction which leads to abnormal cortisol levels which leads to factors that damage the endothelium as well as factors that increase blood clotting leading to plaque growth and heart disease. That's not as simple as cholesterol clogging arteries, is it?
How can one avoid Coronary Heart Disease? Abundant fruits and vegetables, exercise, moderate alcohol consumption, and gracious living are the keys to being healthy. Avoid sugar and tobacco; drink water; sleep 8 hours a night. Never eat on the run. I would add sunshine, or supplementation, for Vitamin D. Everybody used to know this before the "research-based" pharmaceutical companies took over when our grandmothers departed.
by Morley Evans
The Great Cholesterol Con by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is splendid! Kendrick is funny as well as insightful.
After demolishing conventional theory about diet and heart, paying particular attention to cholesterol, Dr. Kendrick concludes that Statin drugs are of no use to women or to men who do not have heart disease -- according to the studies that everyone has used to build the anti-cholesterol empire which has earned hundreds of billions of dollars for some pharmaceutical companies. The conclusions that have been reached are contradicted by the studies themselves. What has happened has all been driven by vast amounts of money. Statins benefit fewer than 5% of the population and for them Statins can only add a few months to their lives if they already have heart disease, according to the studies. This benefit is due to something other than lowering cholesterol, but what? Detracting from nebulous benefits are a superabundance of side-effects. A vast financial empire cannot be built on a foundation like that. Now, can it?
(This leads us to the uncomfortable realization that someone is lying, doesn't it? Can vast numbers of experts be lying? Yes, they can. This is exactly the same phenomenon as Global Warming which is also a vast industry powered by vast amounts of money that has corrupted vast numbers of academics while enriching pseudoscientists like Al Gore, who is a politician, not a scientist, and David Suzuki, who is a broadcaster, not a scientist. Even the Nobel Committee has been corrupted, imagine!)
Dr. Kendrick makes the case that heart disease is created by unhealthy stressors which lead to HPA-axis dysfunction which leads to abnormal cortisol levels which leads to factors that damage the endothelium as well as factors that increase blood clotting leading to plaque growth and heart disease. That's not as simple as cholesterol clogging arteries, is it?
How can one avoid Coronary Heart Disease? Abundant fruits and vegetables, exercise, moderate alcohol consumption, and gracious living are the keys to being healthy. Avoid sugar and tobacco; drink water; sleep 8 hours a night. Never eat on the run. I would add sunshine, or supplementation, for Vitamin D. Everybody used to know this before the "research-based" pharmaceutical companies took over when our grandmothers departed.
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Mevalonate Pathway
© MMXII V.1.1.4
by Morley Evans
Statin Drugs are mycotoxins that block the Mevalonate Pathway and kill you one-cell-at-a-time. Which cells go first depends on many factors. Rabbits die immediately. Dogs, mice and rats last longer. Some primates (the closest biological species to humans) that were given Statin Drugs had 100% mortality. People die at different rates. Some people acquire symptoms immediately — I did. Others have no apparent symptoms for years. All Statin Drugs kill. If you are taking a Statin Drug, it is killing you. If you want to optimize your health, forget about cholesterol and everything you have heard about it. Don't have your cholesterol tested. Don't take anything to reduce it.
There is no relationship between serum cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. "None at all," according to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick. Lowering your serum cholesterol will not prevent heart attack, atherosclerosis, dementia or lengthen your life by one second. Statins will not save your life. Taking Statin Drugs kills you one-cell-at-a-time, for sure and without question. The only questions are how long it will take you to die and what the pathologist will say killed you.
Statin Drugs block the Mevalonate Pathway inside your cells. Statins block 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase or HMG-CoA reductase for short. Because cells require cholesterol and isoprenoids to live and reductase — that allows them to be made — is blocked, the cell makes more reductase as well as extra cholesterol receptors on the outside of the cell to bring cholesterol into the cell from the blood. Serum cholesterol drops as a result. Your doctor is happy. But the cell gets no isoprenoids and DNA division and cell reproduction is arrested. Your body is not happy. Your cell dies and so do you. Every cell in your body is impaired by Statin Drugs, not only liver cells. Statins cross the blood-brain barrier to create dementia and polyneuropathy. Statins kill you and you get no benefit. Nothing. They don't even make you feel good. In fact they will probably make you feel lousy. Muscle pain and damage (myopathy and rhabdomyolysis) is very common, not rare as the pharmaceutical companies claim. So is polyneuropathy (my feet felt as if they were on fire and my hands were swollen frozen painful claws). This went on for years. Despite your little problems, your doctor will prescribe Statin "therapy" for "the rest of your life", however long that might be. Your doctor will also be prescribing lots of other pharmaceutical drugs to treat all the mysterious diseases you will be getting thanks to Statin Drugs.
Statins are made from mycotoxins. Statins are mycotoxins. Mycotoxins kill by the same mechanism as snake venom and the Portuguese Man-o-War jelly fish. They will also lower your cholesterol. Would you eat Death Cap mushrooms? Probably not, but your doctor is feeding you Statin Drugs and you think he is saving your life. "All medicine is poison," one doctor breezily told me a few years ago. And now you know what he thought.
Today, every pharmaceutical company knows how Statins work. Illness that arises from Statins is not a "Side Effect" or an "Adverse Drug Reaction." Pharmaceutical companies know why you are sick, your doctor probably does not, but he should. Yet pharmaceutical companies — led by Merck and Pfizer — aggressively push Statin Drugs. They are making gazillions of dollars. Statin Drugs are the most profitable pharmaceutical drug in history. You cannot afford the price you pay, even if the Drug Plan is paying for them. Here's what Zocor and Lipitor and my doctors did to me: http://morleyevans2.com/Depraved/Depraved.html
Buy this book and educate yourself. Learn what your doctor should know, but doesn't. Look after yourself. Take a bite out of crime.
BUY THIS BOOK: createspace.com/3829525 YOUR DISCOUNT CODE IS az33n949
Dr. Graveline: http://www.spacedoc.com/index.php
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick: http://morleyevans.blogspot.ca/search?q=kendrick
printable file: http://www.MorleyEvans2.com/Mevalonate.pdf
by Morley Evans
There is no relationship between serum cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. "None at all," according to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick. Lowering your serum cholesterol will not prevent heart attack, atherosclerosis, dementia or lengthen your life by one second. Statins will not save your life. Taking Statin Drugs kills you one-cell-at-a-time, for sure and without question. The only questions are how long it will take you to die and what the pathologist will say killed you.
Statin Drugs block the Mevalonate Pathway inside your cells. Statins block 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase or HMG-CoA reductase for short. Because cells require cholesterol and isoprenoids to live and reductase — that allows them to be made — is blocked, the cell makes more reductase as well as extra cholesterol receptors on the outside of the cell to bring cholesterol into the cell from the blood. Serum cholesterol drops as a result. Your doctor is happy. But the cell gets no isoprenoids and DNA division and cell reproduction is arrested. Your body is not happy. Your cell dies and so do you. Every cell in your body is impaired by Statin Drugs, not only liver cells. Statins cross the blood-brain barrier to create dementia and polyneuropathy. Statins kill you and you get no benefit. Nothing. They don't even make you feel good. In fact they will probably make you feel lousy. Muscle pain and damage (myopathy and rhabdomyolysis) is very common, not rare as the pharmaceutical companies claim. So is polyneuropathy (my feet felt as if they were on fire and my hands were swollen frozen painful claws). This went on for years. Despite your little problems, your doctor will prescribe Statin "therapy" for "the rest of your life", however long that might be. Your doctor will also be prescribing lots of other pharmaceutical drugs to treat all the mysterious diseases you will be getting thanks to Statin Drugs.
Statins are made from mycotoxins. Statins are mycotoxins. Mycotoxins kill by the same mechanism as snake venom and the Portuguese Man-o-War jelly fish. They will also lower your cholesterol. Would you eat Death Cap mushrooms? Probably not, but your doctor is feeding you Statin Drugs and you think he is saving your life. "All medicine is poison," one doctor breezily told me a few years ago. And now you know what he thought.
Today, every pharmaceutical company knows how Statins work. Illness that arises from Statins is not a "Side Effect" or an "Adverse Drug Reaction." Pharmaceutical companies know why you are sick, your doctor probably does not, but he should. Yet pharmaceutical companies — led by Merck and Pfizer — aggressively push Statin Drugs. They are making gazillions of dollars. Statin Drugs are the most profitable pharmaceutical drug in history. You cannot afford the price you pay, even if the Drug Plan is paying for them. Here's what Zocor and Lipitor and my doctors did to me: http://morleyevans2.com/Depraved/Depraved.html
Buy this book and educate yourself. Learn what your doctor should know, but doesn't. Look after yourself. Take a bite out of crime.
BUY THIS BOOK: createspace.com/3829525 YOUR DISCOUNT CODE IS az33n949
Dr. Graveline: http://www.spacedoc.com/index.php
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick: http://morleyevans.blogspot.ca/search?q=kendrick
printable file: http://www.MorleyEvans2.com/Mevalonate.pdf
Thursday, April 12, 2012
What, me worry?
© MMXII V.1.1.4
by Morley Evans
by Morley Evans
Chlorine in our water? Mercury in our teeth? Fluoride in our water and in our toothpaste too? Antibiotics and hormones in our food? Factory farming? Sugar? Formaldehyde? Lead? Radiation indiscriminately used by doctors? (What doctors do must be safe, right? Doctors are so smart. Doctors went to medical school and everything! Doctors are practically super-human.) Herbicides and pesticides everywhere? Thousands of man-made chemicals that did not exist anywhere in the universe before 1940 everywhere? INFLATION? Alien species destroying native habitats? Mass extinction of animals and plants? Pharmaceutical drugs for everyone? A destruction of social taboos and traditional moral codes? (Who needs them? Pornography rules!) Dropping birth rate? Materialism? The Global Warming HOAX? Genetically engineered food? Crime? WARMONGERING? Pollution? Corruption? ARE WE IN TROUBLE? Are we headed for extinction, by our own environmental engineering? We are so smart!
Questions, questions: Morley, you are so negative. Are you an eco-terrorist? Are you a health food nut? Try to be positive. We are making lots of money. What we are doing works. Just shut up and do your bit, or else.
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick says the Swiss have the highest "cholesterol" level in the world, but they have the lowest Cardiovascular Disease after the French. [1] The Swiss do not chlorinate their water. It is illegal to chlorinate Swiss water. They get Swiss water from Alpine streams. [2] Swiss water is as pure as it gets, except possibly in Bhutan. France is not so clear-cut. One would need to look at where they chlorinate French water and see if they have less CVD where they do not chlorinate and more where they do. Low French CVD may have nothing to do with French wine and everything to do with ozone. Here's an interesting story:
When some geniuses in Paris were planning to build a freeway through wine country, the grape growers said, "We have learned how to make wine by trial and error over a thousand years. If a million cars a day drive through here, we don't know what will happen AND NEITHER DO YOU." Plans were dropped, I hope.
When some geniuses in Paris were planning to build a freeway through wine country, the grape growers said, "We have learned how to make wine by trial and error over a thousand years. If a million cars a day drive through here, we don't know what will happen AND NEITHER DO YOU." Plans were dropped, I hope.
Better living with chemistry? We are so smart! We put men on the moon! We can blow up stuff! Boy oh boy, we will rule the world forever! Money, money, money, mmmm, money. We are SO smart!!
[1] Dr. Malcolm Kendrick:
[2] As usual, I found this in two seconds on Google:
The Internet, which was invented by DARPA during the Cold War may be the best thing ever invented. PROVING: One never knows whom one will have to thank.
Sunday, July 15, 2018
MEVALONATE PATHWAY II
© MMXVIII V.1.0.3
by Morley Evans
Statin Drugs are mycotoxins that block the Mevalonate Pathway and kill you one-cell-at-a-time. Which cells go first depends on many factors. Rabbits die immediately. Dogs, mice and rats last longer. Some primates (the closest biological species to humans) that were given Statin Drugs had 100% mortality. People die at different rates. Some people acquire symptoms immediately — I did. Others have no apparent symptoms for years. All Statin Drugs kill. If you are taking a Statin Drug, it is killing you. If you want to optimize your health, forget about cholesterol and everything you have heard about it. Don't have your cholesterol tested. Don't take anything to reduce it.
There is no relationship between serum cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. "None at all," according to Dr Malcolm Kendrick. Lowering your serum cholesterol will not prevent heart attack, atherosclerosis, dementia or lengthen your life by one second. Statins will not save your life. Taking Statin Drugs kills you one-cell-at-a-time, for sure and without question. The only questions are how long it will take you to die and what the pathologist will say killed you.
Statin Drugs block the Mevalonate Pathway inside your cells. Statins block 3-hydroxy-3-methyl- glutaryl-CoA reductase or HMG-CoA reductase for short. Because cells require cholesterol and isoprenoids to live and reductase — that allows them to be made — is blocked, the cell makes more reductase as well as extra cholesterol receptors on the outside of the cell to bring cholesterol into the cell from the blood. Serum cholesterol drops as a result.
Your doctor is happy. But the cell gets no isoprenoids and DNA division and cell reproduction are arrested. Your body is not happy. Your cell dies and so do you. Every cell in your body is impaired by Statin Drugs, not only liver cells.
Statins cross the blood-brain barrier creating dementia and peripheral neuropathy. Statins kill you and you get no benefit. Nothing. They don't even make you feel good. In fact, they will probably make you feel lousy. Muscle pain and damage (myopathy and rhabdomyolysis) are very common, not rare as the pharmaceutical companies claim. So is peripheral neuropathy (my feet felt as if they were on fire and my hands were swollen frozen painful claws). This went on for years 24/7. Despite your "little problems", your doctor will prescribe Statin "therapy" for "the rest of your life", however long that might be. Your doctor will also be prescribing lots of other pharmaceutical drugs to treat all the mysterious diseases you will be getting thanks to Statin Drugs.
Statins are made from mycotoxins.
Statins are mycotoxins. Mycotoxins kill like snake venom and the Portuguese Man-o-War jellyfish kill. They may also lower your cholesterol too. Who cares? Would you eat Death Cap mushrooms? Probably not, but your doctor is feeding you Statin Drugs and you think he is saving your life. "All medicine is poison," one doctor breezily told me a few years ago. And now you know what Dr John N. Alport, MD,thought thinks. Do these people think?
Today, every pharmaceutical company knows how Statins work. An illness that arises from Statins is not a "Side Effect" or an "Adverse Drug Reaction." Pharmaceutical companies know why you are sick, your doctor probably does not, but he should. Yet pharmaceutical companies — led by Merck and Pfizer — aggressively push Statin Drugs. They are making gazillions of dollars. Statin Drugs are the most profitable pharmaceutical drug in history. You cannot afford the price you pay, even if a Drug Plan is paying for them. Here's what Zocor and Lipitor and my doctors did to me: http://morleyevans2.com/Depraved/Depraved.html
Buy this book and educate yourself. Learn what your doctor should know, but doesn't. Look after yourself. Take a bite out of crime.
BUY THIS BOOK:
Amazon http://www.amazon.com/Statin-Drugs-Really-Lower-Cholesterol/dp/0615618170/ref=sr_1_1? s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1334516731&sr=1-1
Dr. Graveline:
http://www.spacedoc.com/index.php
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick:
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/books-by-dr-malcolm-kendrick/the-great-cholesterol-con/
SUESTATINS.com
by Morley Evans
The Mevalonate Pathway
by Morley Evans © MMXII
There is no relationship between serum cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. "None at all," according to Dr Malcolm Kendrick. Lowering your serum cholesterol will not prevent heart attack, atherosclerosis, dementia or lengthen your life by one second. Statins will not save your life. Taking Statin Drugs kills you one-cell-at-a-time, for sure and without question. The only questions are how long it will take you to die and what the pathologist will say killed you.
Statin Drugs block the Mevalonate Pathway inside your cells. Statins block 3-hydroxy-3-methyl- glutaryl-CoA reductase or HMG-CoA reductase for short. Because cells require cholesterol and isoprenoids to live and reductase — that allows them to be made — is blocked, the cell makes more reductase as well as extra cholesterol receptors on the outside of the cell to bring cholesterol into the cell from the blood. Serum cholesterol drops as a result.
Your doctor is happy. But the cell gets no isoprenoids and DNA division and cell reproduction are arrested. Your body is not happy. Your cell dies and so do you. Every cell in your body is impaired by Statin Drugs, not only liver cells.
Statins cross the blood-brain barrier creating dementia and peripheral neuropathy. Statins kill you and you get no benefit. Nothing. They don't even make you feel good. In fact, they will probably make you feel lousy. Muscle pain and damage (myopathy and rhabdomyolysis) are very common, not rare as the pharmaceutical companies claim. So is peripheral neuropathy (my feet felt as if they were on fire and my hands were swollen frozen painful claws). This went on for years 24/7. Despite your "little problems", your doctor will prescribe Statin "therapy" for "the rest of your life", however long that might be. Your doctor will also be prescribing lots of other pharmaceutical drugs to treat all the mysterious diseases you will be getting thanks to Statin Drugs.
Statins are made from mycotoxins.
Statins are mycotoxins. Mycotoxins kill like snake venom and the Portuguese Man-o-War jellyfish kill. They may also lower your cholesterol too. Who cares? Would you eat Death Cap mushrooms? Probably not, but your doctor is feeding you Statin Drugs and you think he is saving your life. "All medicine is poison," one doctor breezily told me a few years ago. And now you know what Dr John N. Alport, MD,
Today, every pharmaceutical company knows how Statins work. An illness that arises from Statins is not a "Side Effect" or an "Adverse Drug Reaction." Pharmaceutical companies know why you are sick, your doctor probably does not, but he should. Yet pharmaceutical companies — led by Merck and Pfizer — aggressively push Statin Drugs. They are making gazillions of dollars. Statin Drugs are the most profitable pharmaceutical drug in history. You cannot afford the price you pay, even if a Drug Plan is paying for them. Here's what Zocor and Lipitor and my doctors did to me: http://morleyevans2.com/Depraved/Depraved.html
Buy this book and educate yourself. Learn what your doctor should know, but doesn't. Look after yourself. Take a bite out of crime.
BUY THIS BOOK:
Amazon http://www.amazon.com/Statin-Drugs-Really-Lower-Cholesterol/dp/0615618170/ref=sr_1_1? s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1334516731&sr=1-1
Dr. Graveline:
http://www.spacedoc.com/index.php
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick:
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/books-by-dr-malcolm-kendrick/the-great-cholesterol-con/
SUESTATINS.com
Friday, November 27, 2009
Cholesterol and Cancer
© MMIX V.1.0.1
I did not know that people with high cholesterol levels have a reduced risk of getting cancer. Did you? All I have ever seen or heard is that cholesterol is bad. But here is an essay by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick with the statement that high cholesterol is associated with low cancer as well as other risks for mortality. This is in his essay about the abuse of science and the corruption of medicine in general and medical journals in particular by pharmaceutical companies with big money.
- Morley
May 24, 2005
STATINS AND CANCER - (NOW IT IS GETTING SILLY)
By Red Flags Columnist, Dr. Malcolm Kendrick
I was not sure whether to even bother responding to the latest news that statins prevent breast cancer. But I think I must, as I believe we are now entering very dangerous ground with statins. We are moving beyond accentuating the positive towards a total distortion of the facts. Over the last year or so, I have seen articles stating that statins prevent Alzheimer’s, prostate cancer, heart failure and now breast cancer. I have seen, and groaned.
"When we looked at statin use prior to breast cancer, what we found was that users of statins were 51 per cent less likely to develop breast cancer as opposed to those who were not using a statin," Dr Khurana said.
How, you may ask, can this be true when the latest TNT study, CARE, J-LIT, ASCOT-LLA and other too numerous to mention seemed to show a significant trend towards increased cancer in those taking statins.
The answer is that these studies are not mutually contradictory – just the way they are interpreted. Dr Khurana’s study was not a placebo controlled clinical trial. He, and his team, merely looked at forty thousand women, and found that those given statins were less likely to have breast cancer.
He decided to interpret this as possible proof that statins protect against cancer. But there are three possible explanations for this finding:
· Chance
· Statins protect against breast cancer
· Women given statins were less likely to get breast cancer in the first place
Explanation one is possible, but uninteresting. Explanation two would contradict many of the statin trails, where rates of cancer were higher in those taking statins. Ergo, it seems unlikely to be correct.
Explanation three, however, fits what is already known about cholesterol levels, statins and cancer risk. Firstly, we know that those given statins will have higher cholesterol levels than those not given statins. Secondly, study after study has shown that people with high cholesterol levels are at a greatly reduced risk of cancer.
You may have seen the study in Geriatrics earlier this year demonstrating that, in the elderly, a low cholesterol level was associated with a doubled risk of death – from all causes - especially cancer. A much, much bigger study was done in Austria, looking at cholesterol levels vs. risk of death. One hundred and fifty thousand people were studied over fifteen years.
‘In men, across the entire age range, although of borderline significance under the age of 50, and in women from the age of 50 onward only, low cholesterol was significantly associated with all-cause mortality, showing significant associations with death through cancer, liver diseases, and mental diseases.’
So, we give statins to a group of women who – because they have high cholesterol levels – are at a significantly reduced risk of cancer. When they are found to have a lower risk of cancer on statins, we claim that statins reduce the risk of cancer.
We then receive large sums of money from statin manufacturing company X. We then become a respected international opinion leader. We are then asked to sit on committees making up guidelines on the prevention of heart disease. We then act as peer-reviewers for journals so that when someone writes a letter such as the one below, written to the NEJM – we can reject it.
TO THE EDITOR: La Rosa et al.(1) claim to have shown significant clinical benefit from 80mg of atorvastatin per day compared with 10mg per day. The clinical benefits claimed were solely in selected cardiovascular end points. There was no increase in overall survival since there were more deaths from malignancies and other fatal conditions. For every malignancy that was fatal, or other condition that proved fatal, many more malignancies or other potentially fatal conditions must have been diagnosed. The morbidity from serious non-cardiac conditions is never considered in studies of statins where there is no increase in survival with treatment.
Exchanging a cardiac death for the prolonged misery of death from a malignancy or from another fatal condition can hardly be claimed to be a clinical benefit. The purveyors of the statins need to look with more objectivity at the overall effects of those agents. Even when there is an apparently impressive increase in overall survival, the real gains are negligible (2).
Louis H. Krut, MB.ChB., M.D.
1. La Rosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005;323:1425-35.
2. Krut LH. On the statins, correcting plasma lipid levels, and preventing the clinical sequelae of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease. Amer J Cardiol 1998;81:1045-6.
http://www.thincs.org/Malcolm3.htm#may%2024
I did not know that people with high cholesterol levels have a reduced risk of getting cancer. Did you? All I have ever seen or heard is that cholesterol is bad. But here is an essay by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick with the statement that high cholesterol is associated with low cancer as well as other risks for mortality. This is in his essay about the abuse of science and the corruption of medicine in general and medical journals in particular by pharmaceutical companies with big money.
- Morley
May 24, 2005
STATINS AND CANCER - (NOW IT IS GETTING SILLY)
By Red Flags Columnist, Dr. Malcolm Kendrick
I was not sure whether to even bother responding to the latest news that statins prevent breast cancer. But I think I must, as I believe we are now entering very dangerous ground with statins. We are moving beyond accentuating the positive towards a total distortion of the facts. Over the last year or so, I have seen articles stating that statins prevent Alzheimer’s, prostate cancer, heart failure and now breast cancer. I have seen, and groaned.
"When we looked at statin use prior to breast cancer, what we found was that users of statins were 51 per cent less likely to develop breast cancer as opposed to those who were not using a statin," Dr Khurana said.
How, you may ask, can this be true when the latest TNT study, CARE, J-LIT, ASCOT-LLA and other too numerous to mention seemed to show a significant trend towards increased cancer in those taking statins.
The answer is that these studies are not mutually contradictory – just the way they are interpreted. Dr Khurana’s study was not a placebo controlled clinical trial. He, and his team, merely looked at forty thousand women, and found that those given statins were less likely to have breast cancer.
He decided to interpret this as possible proof that statins protect against cancer. But there are three possible explanations for this finding:
· Chance
· Statins protect against breast cancer
· Women given statins were less likely to get breast cancer in the first place
Explanation one is possible, but uninteresting. Explanation two would contradict many of the statin trails, where rates of cancer were higher in those taking statins. Ergo, it seems unlikely to be correct.
Explanation three, however, fits what is already known about cholesterol levels, statins and cancer risk. Firstly, we know that those given statins will have higher cholesterol levels than those not given statins. Secondly, study after study has shown that people with high cholesterol levels are at a greatly reduced risk of cancer.
You may have seen the study in Geriatrics earlier this year demonstrating that, in the elderly, a low cholesterol level was associated with a doubled risk of death – from all causes - especially cancer. A much, much bigger study was done in Austria, looking at cholesterol levels vs. risk of death. One hundred and fifty thousand people were studied over fifteen years.
‘In men, across the entire age range, although of borderline significance under the age of 50, and in women from the age of 50 onward only, low cholesterol was significantly associated with all-cause mortality, showing significant associations with death through cancer, liver diseases, and mental diseases.’
So, we give statins to a group of women who – because they have high cholesterol levels – are at a significantly reduced risk of cancer. When they are found to have a lower risk of cancer on statins, we claim that statins reduce the risk of cancer.
We then receive large sums of money from statin manufacturing company X. We then become a respected international opinion leader. We are then asked to sit on committees making up guidelines on the prevention of heart disease. We then act as peer-reviewers for journals so that when someone writes a letter such as the one below, written to the NEJM – we can reject it.
TO THE EDITOR: La Rosa et al.(1) claim to have shown significant clinical benefit from 80mg of atorvastatin per day compared with 10mg per day. The clinical benefits claimed were solely in selected cardiovascular end points. There was no increase in overall survival since there were more deaths from malignancies and other fatal conditions. For every malignancy that was fatal, or other condition that proved fatal, many more malignancies or other potentially fatal conditions must have been diagnosed. The morbidity from serious non-cardiac conditions is never considered in studies of statins where there is no increase in survival with treatment.
Exchanging a cardiac death for the prolonged misery of death from a malignancy or from another fatal condition can hardly be claimed to be a clinical benefit. The purveyors of the statins need to look with more objectivity at the overall effects of those agents. Even when there is an apparently impressive increase in overall survival, the real gains are negligible (2).
Louis H. Krut, MB.ChB., M.D.
1. La Rosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005;323:1425-35.
2. Krut LH. On the statins, correcting plasma lipid levels, and preventing the clinical sequelae of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease. Amer J Cardiol 1998;81:1045-6.
http://www.thincs.org/Malcolm3.htm#may%2024
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Ask A Patient
© MMX V.1.1.7
by Morley Evans
ZOCOR (Merck & Co., Inc.) | LIPITOR (Pfizer, Inc.): They are proud to say they are the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. Statin drugs are the most profitable pharmaceutical products in history! Billions of dollars are made every year selling statin drugs to lower cholesterol (which is completely unnecessary and harmful). They sell dozens of other pharmaceutical products, of course. All have side effects. All are very profitable. Money is their guiding star. Money, money, money, mmm, money . . .
I added a few thoughts about Zocor and Lipitor to "Ask a Patient". While the harm done to me was great, the problem is much larger than me and the doctors involved in my own case. Canadian medicine is a vast criminal empire. Reforming it will take time. Patient patients will be rewarded.
Side Effects: myalgia, neuralgia, insomnia, dementia, polyneuropathy, rhabdomyolisis, subdural hematoma, coma, and pain, pain pain. It has taken me 18 years to recover from what was started in 1992 by my doctor, John N. Alport, M.D., may he and his tribe burn in Hell. Add these side effects: bowel and bladder incontinence, severe joint pain, swollen fingers and throbbing hands, rheumatism, arthritis, bursitis, tendonitis, difficulty swallowing, numbness, feet that felt as if they were on fire, hair loss, and tinnitus.
Comments: Before they go to Hell, the people at Merck, Pfizer and the doctors who shill for them should be sent to a very nasty prison. Merck, Pfizer and their doctor mountebanks should be stripped of every asset including their medical licenses. They should be disgraced and totally destroyed. The proceeds of their financial liquidation should be distributed to their victims. These crooks sit on an astronomical fortune. According to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick (I recommend him highly), Merck started the statin industry when Merck bought lovastatin from the US Army. If so, any similarity between the side effects of all statin drugs to various drugs used to torture people would not be coincidental. Why can I not rate Zocor and Lipitor lower than one at "Ask a Patient"? Zocor and Lipitor deserve a much lower rating than zero. I am extremely dissatisfied with Zocor, Lipitor and the idiots who prescribe them and lie to cover up their crimes.
Go to "Ask a Patient" to discover what patients really think about the pharmaceutical nostrums their doctors have prescribed for them. http://www.askapatient.com
Lipitor caused as much harm of the same nature as Zocor. Lipitor proves that Zocor was the cause of my illness when I was taking Zocor and Zocor proves that Lipitor was the cause of my illness when I was taking Lipitor. Two double blind studies of statin drugs were conducted on me between 1992 and 2000 by ignoramuses licensed to practice medicine. I certainly never suspected that the statins were causing my problems or I would have stopped taking them. The doctors were unaware of the side effects too (apparently), so they prescribed more drugs to treat the side effects and eventually referred me to specialists who never made a correct diagnosis themselves. Even when confronted with the evidence all but Dr. Cenaiko denied Statins could be responsible. "Statins can't do that." Yes, they do, doc. Read the product monographs. You can read, can't you?
You can add your own comments at www.askapatient.com. Go ahead. Did you know it is estimated that 25% of all doctors and pharmacists abuse drugs themselves and addiction is common? An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association ranks doctors as the third leading cause of death behind cancer and heart disease (CVD). They claim to be our leading citizens. Isn't that amazing?
______________________
Dr. Duane Graveline: http://www.spacedoc.net/advicor_side_effects.htm
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick's The Great Cholesterol Con
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8SSCNaaDcE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv2Z3UWYJKk&NR=1
Dr. Barbara Starfield http://faculty.jhsph.edu/default.cfm?faculty_id=667
http://www.naturodoc.com/library/public_health/doctors_cause_death.htm
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/an-exclusive-interview-with-dr-barbara-starfield-medically-caused-death-in-america/
by Morley Evans
ZOCOR (Merck & Co., Inc.) | LIPITOR (Pfizer, Inc.): They are proud to say they are the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. Statin drugs are the most profitable pharmaceutical products in history! Billions of dollars are made every year selling statin drugs to lower cholesterol (which is completely unnecessary and harmful). They sell dozens of other pharmaceutical products, of course. All have side effects. All are very profitable. Money is their guiding star. Money, money, money, mmm, money . . .
I added a few thoughts about Zocor and Lipitor to "Ask a Patient". While the harm done to me was great, the problem is much larger than me and the doctors involved in my own case. Canadian medicine is a vast criminal empire. Reforming it will take time. Patient patients will be rewarded.
Side Effects: myalgia, neuralgia, insomnia, dementia, polyneuropathy, rhabdomyolisis, subdural hematoma, coma, and pain, pain pain. It has taken me 18 years to recover from what was started in 1992 by my doctor, John N. Alport, M.D., may he and his tribe burn in Hell. Add these side effects: bowel and bladder incontinence, severe joint pain, swollen fingers and throbbing hands, rheumatism, arthritis, bursitis, tendonitis, difficulty swallowing, numbness, feet that felt as if they were on fire, hair loss, and tinnitus.
Comments: Before they go to Hell, the people at Merck, Pfizer and the doctors who shill for them should be sent to a very nasty prison. Merck, Pfizer and their doctor mountebanks should be stripped of every asset including their medical licenses. They should be disgraced and totally destroyed. The proceeds of their financial liquidation should be distributed to their victims. These crooks sit on an astronomical fortune. According to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick (I recommend him highly), Merck started the statin industry when Merck bought lovastatin from the US Army. If so, any similarity between the side effects of all statin drugs to various drugs used to torture people would not be coincidental. Why can I not rate Zocor and Lipitor lower than one at "Ask a Patient"? Zocor and Lipitor deserve a much lower rating than zero. I am extremely dissatisfied with Zocor, Lipitor and the idiots who prescribe them and lie to cover up their crimes.
Go to "Ask a Patient" to discover what patients really think about the pharmaceutical nostrums their doctors have prescribed for them. http://www.askapatient.com
Lipitor caused as much harm of the same nature as Zocor. Lipitor proves that Zocor was the cause of my illness when I was taking Zocor and Zocor proves that Lipitor was the cause of my illness when I was taking Lipitor. Two double blind studies of statin drugs were conducted on me between 1992 and 2000 by ignoramuses licensed to practice medicine. I certainly never suspected that the statins were causing my problems or I would have stopped taking them. The doctors were unaware of the side effects too (apparently), so they prescribed more drugs to treat the side effects and eventually referred me to specialists who never made a correct diagnosis themselves. Even when confronted with the evidence all but Dr. Cenaiko denied Statins could be responsible. "Statins can't do that." Yes, they do, doc. Read the product monographs. You can read, can't you?
You can add your own comments at www.askapatient.com. Go ahead. Did you know it is estimated that 25% of all doctors and pharmacists abuse drugs themselves and addiction is common? An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association ranks doctors as the third leading cause of death behind cancer and heart disease (CVD). They claim to be our leading citizens. Isn't that amazing?
______________________
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick's The Great Cholesterol Con
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8SSCNaaDcE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv2Z3UWYJKk&NR=1
Dr. Barbara Starfield http://faculty.jhsph.edu/default.cfm?faculty_id=667
http://www.naturodoc.com/library/public_health/doctors_cause_death.htm
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/an-exclusive-interview-with-dr-barbara-starfield-medically-caused-death-in-america/
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, M.D.
© MXII V.1.0.3
by Morley Evans
Here is Dr. Malcolm Kendrick explaining, again, that cholesterol has nothing to do with cardiovascular disease (CVD), heart attacks, strokes and other diseases of the circulatory system. Despite this, everyone believes cholesterol is a deadly hazard to health. Everyone knows that is true. Everyone from your grocer to your doctor to the friendly folks who sell Statin drugs to lower cholesterol. They have made gazillions of dollars selling cholesterol lowering drugs. They have changed the food industry world-wide. Everyone is on a Statin drug, yet "heart disease" continues to be the Number One Killer in a neck and neck race to death with Cancer. The benefit of this nonsense is Zero — except to the pharmaceutical industry of course — while the cost to everyone is enormous. People suffer and die while "conventional" medical costs soar, bankrupting families and even governments.
Learn and Live
_____________________________________________________________
by Morley Evans
Here is Dr. Malcolm Kendrick explaining, again, that cholesterol has nothing to do with cardiovascular disease (CVD), heart attacks, strokes and other diseases of the circulatory system. Despite this, everyone believes cholesterol is a deadly hazard to health. Everyone knows that is true. Everyone from your grocer to your doctor to the friendly folks who sell Statin drugs to lower cholesterol. They have made gazillions of dollars selling cholesterol lowering drugs. They have changed the food industry world-wide. Everyone is on a Statin drug, yet "heart disease" continues to be the Number One Killer in a neck and neck race to death with Cancer. The benefit of this nonsense is Zero — except to the pharmaceutical industry of course — while the cost to everyone is enormous. People suffer and die while "conventional" medical costs soar, bankrupting families and even governments.
Learn and Live
_____________________________________________________________
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Malcolm Kendrick, M.D.
© MMX V.1.0.7
by Morley Evans
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is one of the medical experts who debunks the cholesterol hypothesis. This hoax has swept the world and affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people. The cholesterol hoax has helped no one. It has only enriched the pharmaceutical giants which were already over-stuffed with filthy lucre. Suffering from Gluttony and Greed, Big Pharma and Big Medicine need to be put on a Big Diet. That may not help them. Their condition may be terminal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8SSCNaaDcE
Why am I not concerned about my own cholesterol level which is 9.42 mmol/L (364.26914 mg/dl)? For one: people who have high cholesterol do not get cancer! For two: cholesterol does not cause Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Furthermore, I do not have any of the symptoms or problems the hypothesis insists I should have. Since I got rid of the cholesterol lowering meds that were killing me along with the doctors who had prescribed them, I am healthy for the first time in my life. I am 50 years younger than I was 5 years ago! Can you say that? Good nutrition, not advertising, doctors and pharmaceuticals, is the answer to malnutrition. You’d think the medical geniuses who run everything would be interested in me. They aren’t. Why not? That's because they are not interested in helping people nor are they interested in science. Their only interests are money and position. To Hell with them for what they have done.
by Morley Evans
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is one of the medical experts who debunks the cholesterol hypothesis. This hoax has swept the world and affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people. The cholesterol hoax has helped no one. It has only enriched the pharmaceutical giants which were already over-stuffed with filthy lucre. Suffering from Gluttony and Greed, Big Pharma and Big Medicine need to be put on a Big Diet. That may not help them. Their condition may be terminal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8SSCNaaDcE
Why am I not concerned about my own cholesterol level which is 9.42 mmol/L (364.26914 mg/dl)? For one: people who have high cholesterol do not get cancer! For two: cholesterol does not cause Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Furthermore, I do not have any of the symptoms or problems the hypothesis insists I should have. Since I got rid of the cholesterol lowering meds that were killing me along with the doctors who had prescribed them, I am healthy for the first time in my life. I am 50 years younger than I was 5 years ago! Can you say that? Good nutrition, not advertising, doctors and pharmaceuticals, is the answer to malnutrition. You’d think the medical geniuses who run everything would be interested in me. They aren’t. Why not? That's because they are not interested in helping people nor are they interested in science. Their only interests are money and position. To Hell with them for what they have done.
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Depraved HYPERCHOLESTEROLMANIA
© MMXI v.1.2.3
by Morley Evans
The pharmaceutical industry certainly does defend itself well. The anti-cholesterol campaign has been the most profitable pharmaceutical scheme ever. Dietary habits world-wide have been changed along with food production. Big Pharma has raked in zillions. Doctors, like Malcolm Kendrick, have little chance against the tsunami of money that floods the media and buys everyone off.
Your mention of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis reminds me of the early years of my eighteen-year-long Depraved HYPERCHOLESTEROLMANIA odyssey. My pain and other problems were a big mystery to my doctor (John N. Alport) who prescribed Zocor® to lower my cholesterol and to the pharmacist (Dean Ast) and his helpers who sold everything to me for years. My misery was certainly a mystery to me.
But my condition would have been no mystery to anyone who read the product monographs that come with Zocor® (Simvastatin), or with Mevacor® (Lovastatin) its predecessor. Physicians are instructed by Merck to immediately discontinue Zocor® "therapy" if a patient reports pain. Patients are advised by Merck that they should not discontinue Zocor® themselves because, "ONLY YOUR DOCTOR HAS THE TRAINING TO WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF A PRESCRIPTION DRUG FOR YOU." (Doctors are trained by the pharmaceutical companies. On top of that, Statin Drugs cause diminished cognition so a patient's mind is impaired by the drug while it destroys his body.) Pfizer has exactly the same warnings for Lipitor® (Artorvastatin) that was prescribed by Annandale when he took over from Alport. Before I started taking Zocor® in 1992, Alport told me, "There are no side effects and new benefits are being discovered all the time. Zocor® prevents Alzheimer's. Take it like a vitamin pill."
I reported EXTREME pain the first day I took Zocor® and the first day I took Lipitor®. I was in pain every day and night for eight years. I saw my doctors regularly all the years I was taking Zocor® and Lipitor®. They prescribed lots of Elavil® (Amitriptyline); Voltaren SR® (Diclofenac), Naproxen® and other NSAIDs; sleeping pills; Hydroxyzine®; Dexedrine®; Ranitidine®; Andriol® and more (!) to deal with the symptoms that were caused by the Statin Drugs they had prescribed as well as a few things that they thought I should try out. Alport also referred me to physiotherapists, a rheumatologist and a psychologist who said, "it's all in your head." My medical problems, which they created, were — and still are — a big joke to them. This is standard medical practice in Regina, SK, Canada. I have over sixty years of experience with doctors here. This was the worst.
THEY DESTROYED MY LIFE AND NEARLY KILLED ME THIS TIME. Boohoo. . .
But I didn't die.
I discovered why I had been sick from a CBS newscast about the recall of Baycol®, fifteen months after I had come out of a coma in June 2000.
Over the past eleven years I have worked to regain my health and to find justice — meaning restitution and changes to prevent this from happening to others. My cholesterol is still through the roof (9.6 mmol/L), yet I am healthier today than I have ever been in my life, proving cholesterol does not matter. I may live another sixty years. Besides optimizing my health, I have also discovered that there is no justice in Canada, despite Canadians' well-known smugness about what a great country Canada is. Doctors and pharmaceutical companies in Canada can do anything they want with complete immunity. I think what I have learned about developing good health and about Canada itself is pretty interesting.
Unlike most other patients, I kept a detailed log of what happened to me. I know who did what and where and when it was done. If one accepts that the doctors and pharmacists were ignorant of the side effects of Statin Drugs, as they pretended, I was the victim of two double-blind clinical trials of Statin Drugs, one on Zocor® that lasted six years and one on Lipitor® that lasted four months. I have a letter from the office of the President of Merck Frosst telling me pharmaceutical companies are prevented by law from helping the people their products have harmed. You can read that letter and all about medicine in Regina and Canada on my CD, Depraved HYPERCHOLESTEROLMANIA. http://morleyevans2.com/Depraved/Depraved.html.
Perhaps no one else cares what these criminals do. Most of their victims are dead and silent, everyone else in Canada is bamboozled by their bullshit or corrupted by their lucre. But things soon will change anyway because the Canadian health care system — which is the worst in the world, because it is completely unresponsive to feedback and is firmly connected to the public trough — is collapsing around our ears. The medical parasite sucks up half of the Canadian Budget [1] and it wants more. The Canadian Medical Association, its creature, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons and the rest of the corrupt structure of Canadian health care will not be part of the new health care system that will be created when the dust settles.
What cannot go on forever does not go on forever.
Roy Romanow, the former Premier of Saskatchewan, who is a lawyer who never practiced law, continues to be paid millions to make suggestions that will improve Canadian healthcare. How nice for him. They might as well convene the coven and sacrifice a goat to their god. A pox on them. You can develop good health and enjoy long life with nutrition and exercise, if you stay away from these morons.
- Morley Evans www.morleyevansjuiceplus.com
by Morley Evans
The pharmaceutical industry certainly does defend itself well. The anti-cholesterol campaign has been the most profitable pharmaceutical scheme ever. Dietary habits world-wide have been changed along with food production. Big Pharma has raked in zillions. Doctors, like Malcolm Kendrick, have little chance against the tsunami of money that floods the media and buys everyone off.
Your mention of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis reminds me of the early years of my eighteen-year-long Depraved HYPERCHOLESTEROLMANIA odyssey. My pain and other problems were a big mystery to my doctor (John N. Alport) who prescribed Zocor® to lower my cholesterol and to the pharmacist (Dean Ast) and his helpers who sold everything to me for years. My misery was certainly a mystery to me.
But my condition would have been no mystery to anyone who read the product monographs that come with Zocor® (Simvastatin), or with Mevacor® (Lovastatin) its predecessor. Physicians are instructed by Merck to immediately discontinue Zocor® "therapy" if a patient reports pain. Patients are advised by Merck that they should not discontinue Zocor® themselves because, "ONLY YOUR DOCTOR HAS THE TRAINING TO WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF A PRESCRIPTION DRUG FOR YOU." (Doctors are trained by the pharmaceutical companies. On top of that, Statin Drugs cause diminished cognition so a patient's mind is impaired by the drug while it destroys his body.) Pfizer has exactly the same warnings for Lipitor® (Artorvastatin) that was prescribed by Annandale when he took over from Alport. Before I started taking Zocor® in 1992, Alport told me, "There are no side effects and new benefits are being discovered all the time. Zocor® prevents Alzheimer's. Take it like a vitamin pill."
I reported EXTREME pain the first day I took Zocor® and the first day I took Lipitor®. I was in pain every day and night for eight years. I saw my doctors regularly all the years I was taking Zocor® and Lipitor®. They prescribed lots of Elavil® (Amitriptyline); Voltaren SR® (Diclofenac), Naproxen® and other NSAIDs; sleeping pills; Hydroxyzine®; Dexedrine®; Ranitidine®; Andriol® and more (!) to deal with the symptoms that were caused by the Statin Drugs they had prescribed as well as a few things that they thought I should try out. Alport also referred me to physiotherapists, a rheumatologist and a psychologist who said, "it's all in your head." My medical problems, which they created, were — and still are — a big joke to them. This is standard medical practice in Regina, SK, Canada. I have over sixty years of experience with doctors here. This was the worst.
THEY DESTROYED MY LIFE AND NEARLY KILLED ME THIS TIME. Boohoo. . .
But I didn't die.
I discovered why I had been sick from a CBS newscast about the recall of Baycol®, fifteen months after I had come out of a coma in June 2000.
Over the past eleven years I have worked to regain my health and to find justice — meaning restitution and changes to prevent this from happening to others. My cholesterol is still through the roof (9.6 mmol/L), yet I am healthier today than I have ever been in my life, proving cholesterol does not matter. I may live another sixty years. Besides optimizing my health, I have also discovered that there is no justice in Canada, despite Canadians' well-known smugness about what a great country Canada is. Doctors and pharmaceutical companies in Canada can do anything they want with complete immunity. I think what I have learned about developing good health and about Canada itself is pretty interesting.
Unlike most other patients, I kept a detailed log of what happened to me. I know who did what and where and when it was done. If one accepts that the doctors and pharmacists were ignorant of the side effects of Statin Drugs, as they pretended, I was the victim of two double-blind clinical trials of Statin Drugs, one on Zocor® that lasted six years and one on Lipitor® that lasted four months. I have a letter from the office of the President of Merck Frosst telling me pharmaceutical companies are prevented by law from helping the people their products have harmed. You can read that letter and all about medicine in Regina and Canada on my CD, Depraved HYPERCHOLESTEROLMANIA. http://morleyevans2.com/Depraved/Depraved.html.
Perhaps no one else cares what these criminals do. Most of their victims are dead and silent, everyone else in Canada is bamboozled by their bullshit or corrupted by their lucre. But things soon will change anyway because the Canadian health care system — which is the worst in the world, because it is completely unresponsive to feedback and is firmly connected to the public trough — is collapsing around our ears. The medical parasite sucks up half of the Canadian Budget [1] and it wants more. The Canadian Medical Association, its creature, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons and the rest of the corrupt structure of Canadian health care will not be part of the new health care system that will be created when the dust settles.
What cannot go on forever does not go on forever.
Roy Romanow, the former Premier of Saskatchewan, who is a lawyer who never practiced law, continues to be paid millions to make suggestions that will improve Canadian healthcare. How nice for him. They might as well convene the coven and sacrifice a goat to their god. A pox on them. You can develop good health and enjoy long life with nutrition and exercise, if you stay away from these morons.
- Morley Evans www.morleyevansjuiceplus.com
The Economist described the scope of the challenge:
Jul 8th 2010 | OTTAWA | from the print edition
[1] http://www.economist.com/node/16542808Health spending, which is administered by the provinces, has increased from nearly 35% of their budgets in 1999 to 46% today. In Ontario, the most populous province, it is set to reach 80% by 2030, leaving pennies for everything else the government does, not counting tax increases or new federal transfers. The biggest culprit is prescription drugs, which have seen their share of public-health spending triple since 1980.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
29,000,000,000 Reasons
© MMXIII V.1.0.1
posted by Morley Evans
There are 29,000,000,000 reasons to lie about cholesterol.
posted by Morley Evans
There are 29,000,000,000 reasons to lie about cholesterol.
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, the indefatigable Scottish doctor, says: My favourite quote on this comes from the Framingham study. It is the single-most influential study on heart disease in the world.
‘In Framingham, Massachusetts, the more saturated fat one ate, the more cholesterol one ate, the more calories one ate, the lower people’s serum cholesterol.’ Dr William Castelli, Director of the Framingham study. 1992
Monday, January 2, 2012
Learn and Live
© MMXII V.1.1.7
by Morley Evans
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, M.D. and others have demonstrated that there is no connection between cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. "None at all." Does this mean you can eat and do anything you want without any fear? No, that is not what it means. What does it mean, then? What should you eat and do?
First, it means that the greatest risk to your health and well-being is your doctor and the rest of the pharmaceutical industry including agribusiness that creates the food we eat and insurance companies and governments that pay for the medical care we buy. Doctors promote nostrums whose raison d'être is making money for themselves and the pharmaceutical companies, not your health and welfare. They really could not care less about you. Don't believe it? Just challenge them and you will find out how much they care. They will choose money over you every time. This is a very serious charge, but they are silent because they have no answer. They are protected. They don't have to answer. This is organized crime.
Second, it means that you need to learn and live by listening to the people who have been arresting and reversing cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, chronic fatigue, chronic pain, insomnia, multiple sclerosis and addiction to alcohol and drugs. Who could these miracle workers be and why don't you know about them?
You don't know about them because you are brainwashed by the "free press" which is owned by such interests as the pharmaceutical industry. Take a look at who is paying for what you watch and read, the advertisers: He who pays the fiddler chooses the songs he plays as well as the songs he doesn't play.
A long — and growing — list of responsible medical doctors who care about their patients has broken free of the pharmaceutical industry and its billions. They have joined other health professionals to say what conventional medicine has always said: "You are what you eat."
Eat mostly (or perhaps exclusively) fruits and vegetables with some grains, seeds and nuts. Sparingly eat animal products or avoid them altogether. Avoid sugar, sweeteners and processed food. Eat fresh, organic, locally grown and raw. Hydrate by drinking lots of pure water, at least 8 glasses a day and more if you exercise strenuously. Get exposure to sunshine. Let simplicity be your guide.
Modern man suffers from a deficiency of micronutrients and phytochemicals as well as the toxicity and inactivity that comes with modern living. Stress kills. This all creates chronic malnutrition.
You don't have to be sick. If you are sick, get well. Learn and Live:
If you live north of the 40th North Parallel, you are seriously challenged. Nothing you eat grows eight months (or less) of the year where you live. Your food must be preserved, canned, processed, frozen or transported as far as tens of thousands of miles to get it to you. Your fresh food is a miracle of modern food handling, but it is not fresh. You don't get any useful sunshine eight months of the year — or less.
If you live on Pringles potato chips and drink Diet Coke or beer while you watch TV, you are doomed. Going to the doctor won't save you.
Juice PLUS+ offers you a unique solution to most of your food-related nutritional problems. Juice PLUS+ is supported by a growing list of Gold-Standard Third Party Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies that have been Published in mainstream Peer-Reviewed medical and scientific journals. Juice PLUS+ content and quality is certified by NSF.
Juice PLUS+ is a source of micronutrients and phytochemicals not a substitute for eating good food. Juice PLUS+ does not claim it will treat or cure any specific disease. Juice PLUS+ will promote general good health.
Board Certified Medical Doctors endorse Juice PLUS+. They share the theme that nutrition matters with a Whose Who of healthcare professionals who successfully treat serious chronic disease. A few of them are listed below. All are independent of Juice PLUS+. Learn and Live.
Charlotte Gerson
Dr. Joseph Mercola, D.O.
Dr. Joel Fuhrman, M.D.
Dr. Neal Barnard, M.D.
Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr., M.D.
Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, M.D.
Dr. T. Colin Campbell, M.D.
Dr. Andrew W. Saul, Ph.D.
Dr. Dean Ornish, M.D.
GrassRoots Heath
Multiple Sclerosis Society
VEGSOURCE
Food Matters
Quackwatch
_______________________________________________________
by Morley Evans
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, M.D. and others have demonstrated that there is no connection between cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. "None at all." Does this mean you can eat and do anything you want without any fear? No, that is not what it means. What does it mean, then? What should you eat and do?
First, it means that the greatest risk to your health and well-being is your doctor and the rest of the pharmaceutical industry including agribusiness that creates the food we eat and insurance companies and governments that pay for the medical care we buy. Doctors promote nostrums whose raison d'être is making money for themselves and the pharmaceutical companies, not your health and welfare. They really could not care less about you. Don't believe it? Just challenge them and you will find out how much they care. They will choose money over you every time. This is a very serious charge, but they are silent because they have no answer. They are protected. They don't have to answer. This is organized crime.
Second, it means that you need to learn and live by listening to the people who have been arresting and reversing cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, chronic fatigue, chronic pain, insomnia, multiple sclerosis and addiction to alcohol and drugs. Who could these miracle workers be and why don't you know about them?
You don't know about them because you are brainwashed by the "free press" which is owned by such interests as the pharmaceutical industry. Take a look at who is paying for what you watch and read, the advertisers: He who pays the fiddler chooses the songs he plays as well as the songs he doesn't play.
A long — and growing — list of responsible medical doctors who care about their patients has broken free of the pharmaceutical industry and its billions. They have joined other health professionals to say what conventional medicine has always said: "You are what you eat."
Eat mostly (or perhaps exclusively) fruits and vegetables with some grains, seeds and nuts. Sparingly eat animal products or avoid them altogether. Avoid sugar, sweeteners and processed food. Eat fresh, organic, locally grown and raw. Hydrate by drinking lots of pure water, at least 8 glasses a day and more if you exercise strenuously. Get exposure to sunshine. Let simplicity be your guide.
Modern man suffers from a deficiency of micronutrients and phytochemicals as well as the toxicity and inactivity that comes with modern living. Stress kills. This all creates chronic malnutrition.
You don't have to be sick. If you are sick, get well. Learn and Live:
If you live north of the 40th North Parallel, you are seriously challenged. Nothing you eat grows eight months (or less) of the year where you live. Your food must be preserved, canned, processed, frozen or transported as far as tens of thousands of miles to get it to you. Your fresh food is a miracle of modern food handling, but it is not fresh. You don't get any useful sunshine eight months of the year — or less.
If you live on Pringles potato chips and drink Diet Coke or beer while you watch TV, you are doomed. Going to the doctor won't save you.
Juice PLUS+ offers you a unique solution to most of your food-related nutritional problems. Juice PLUS+ is supported by a growing list of Gold-Standard Third Party Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies that have been Published in mainstream Peer-Reviewed medical and scientific journals. Juice PLUS+ content and quality is certified by NSF.
Juice PLUS+ is a source of micronutrients and phytochemicals not a substitute for eating good food. Juice PLUS+ does not claim it will treat or cure any specific disease. Juice PLUS+ will promote general good health.
Board Certified Medical Doctors endorse Juice PLUS+. They share the theme that nutrition matters with a Whose Who of healthcare professionals who successfully treat serious chronic disease. A few of them are listed below. All are independent of Juice PLUS+. Learn and Live.
Charlotte Gerson
Dr. Joseph Mercola, D.O.
Dr. Joel Fuhrman, M.D.
Dr. Neal Barnard, M.D.
Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr., M.D.
Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, M.D.
Dr. T. Colin Campbell, M.D.
Dr. Andrew W. Saul, Ph.D.
Dr. Dean Ornish, M.D.
GrassRoots Heath
Multiple Sclerosis Society
VEGSOURCE
Food Matters
Quackwatch
_______________________________________________________
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
Uffe Ravnskov NEWSLETTER April 2014
© MMXIV V.1.0.1
Posted by Morley Evans
with kind permission from
Uffe Ravnskov, MD. PhD.
copyright, all rights reserved
Uffe Ravnskov is a Danish independent researcher, a member of various international scientific organizations and previously a private medical practitioner in Sweden.
Born: 1934 Copenhagen, Denmark
Education: University of Copenhagen
Posted by Morley Evans
with kind permission from
Uffe Ravnskov, MD. PhD.
copyright, all rights reserved
THE TRUTH IS SLOWLY ARRIVING
 |
| Uffe Ravnskov, MD, Ph.D. |
For many years I have published critical reviews and comments about the misleading dietary advices we have got from the leaders of the cholesterol campaign. Last month Rajiv Chowdhury at the Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge and his coworkers published a review of all observational and experimental studies about dietary fats. Not unexpected, at least not for me, they found no evidence for the view that too much fat in our diet increases the risk of heart disease.
Their paper made a headline in New York Times and in many other newspapers all over the world and was followed by violent criticism from many scientists. The critics found some errors and required that the paper should be retracted. The authors corrected the errors, but the corrections did not change the result, and the authors withheld their view: "In conclusion, the pattern of findings from this analysis did not yield clearly supportive evidence for current cardiovascular guidelines that encourage high consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids and low consumption of saturated fats."
You can read more about this story in the magazine Science.
Shortly afterwards Renata Micha from Harvard and her coworkers from various institutions in the US and UK published a review in British Medical Journal about the intake of dietary fats in various countries. They did not specify which fats they considered as beneficial or unhealthy, and in the abstract they concluded the following: "These novel global data on dietary fats and oils identify dramatic diversity across nations and inform policies and priorities for improving global health."
True, but there is no doubt about which types of fat they considered unhealthy; this appears from table 2 and from their references to the medical literature. You can read more about that in my comment to their paper
A curious fact is that the Harvard scientist Dariush Mozaffarian, one of the most eager proponents of the idea that saturated fat should be exchanged with polyunsaturated fat, was coauthor of both papers. According to the "Author contributions" to Chowdhury et al.s paper his role was to make a "critical revision of the article for important intellectual content". He was also the main author of a study published ten years ago about the diet of elderly women with heart disease. The authors followed the women for three years and found that atherosclerosis in those who ate the smallest amounts of saturated fat and the largest amounts of carbohydrates and polyunsaturated fats had worsened the most.
It is not too easy to change one´s mind.
The truth about the statins is also approaching. Here comes a link to an excellent video about the dangerous misinformatins about statin treatment. Read also the publisher´s detailed description of the video. A large step forwards, although some of the critics still seem to be afraid of high cholesterol and saturated fat.
If you wonder how statin treatment has been accepted by the whole world, then read this article in The Seattle Times, or this one in Washington Post
Read also our member Malcolm Kendrick´s comment to statin treatment in The Guardian.
Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD, independent investigator
Spokesman of THINCS, The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics
Magle Stora Kyrkogata 9, 22350 Lund, Sweden
tel +46 46145022 or +46-702580416
www.ravnskov.nu/uffe
My books
My newsletters
Wikipedia
tel +46 46145022 or +46-702580416
www.ravnskov.nu/uffe
My books
My newsletters
Wikipedia
This letter has been sent to you because you have previously shown interest in the many contradictions of the diet-cholesterol-heart hypothesis and/or the work of our group THINCS, The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics (www.thincs.org ). If you do not wish to be on the mailing list, please contact me and I shall delete your name.
Born: 1934 Copenhagen, Denmark
Education: University of Copenhagen
————————————
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Our Leaders Do Not Lie
© MMX V.1.0.5
by Morley Evans
Some of my readers may get the wrong impression from my articles.
To set the record straight: I must emphatically state that our leaders do not lie. In fact, they protect the truth fastidiously.
Truth is kept in a drug induced coma inside a locked room atop a tower surrounded by ferocious beasts dripping crimson from fang and claw.
Truth is safe; don't worry your pretty little heads.
with thanks to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, M.D.
by Morley Evans
Some of my readers may get the wrong impression from my articles.
To set the record straight: I must emphatically state that our leaders do not lie. In fact, they protect the truth fastidiously.
Truth is kept in a drug induced coma inside a locked room atop a tower surrounded by ferocious beasts dripping crimson from fang and claw.
Truth is safe; don't worry your pretty little heads.
with thanks to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, M.D.
Monday, September 28, 2020
COVID in SWEDEN
© MMXX V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans
More COVID19
news from Sweden
by Dr Malcolm Kendrick
September 19, 2020
A few weeks ago, an emergency physician working in Sweden, Dr Sebastian Rushworth, asked me if I would be willing to replicate an article from his blog on mine. I was more than happy; it was a great article. The only problem being that his writing puts mine to shame – in a second language. Although he did later tell me he had been to boarding school in England for several years. So, I feel a bit better. If not much.
He has now done an update, outlining how things are getting along in Sweden. I thought it would be of great interest for people to get news from the front line, so to speak.
As many of us know Sweden, alone in Western Europe, decided not to impose a tough lockdown. In fact, the only forcible restriction that was imposed was to ban people meeting in groups of more than fifty. Slightly later, a further restriction was placed on nursing home visits.
Apart from this, all other Government recommendations were purely voluntary [Imagine that! A Government treating its citizens as responsible human beings].
When Sebastian wrote to me recently, I sent him back this e-mail.
“Great article. Could you send it in Word format? I will obviously link back to your blog.
Also, would it be possible to put in an additional section – to go at the front of the piece – as to what measures were taken in Sweden, and what the average person in Sweden actually did. The narrative we now have (from the pro-Lockdown lobby) is that the people of Sweden, being so law-abiding and community aware, essentially locked themselves down.
Which meant that the Swedish partial lockdown was more effective than, for example, the UK ‘harsh’ lockdown. Because the Swedes self-policed themselves, and the Brits did not. This is usually stated with great confidence from people who provide no evidence to back this assertion up. People who have probably never been to Sweden, nor ever talked to anyone from Sweden and probably couldn’t point to Sweden on a map.
I understand schools stayed open, bars and restaurants stayed open. Gatherings of more than five hundred people were prohibited etc. What did Swedes do with masks, and going to work, for example? I think that information directly from the front line in Sweden, on these things, would be useful for people to know.”
So, Sebastian added a bit onto the front as follows:
“At the beginning of August, I wrote an article about my experiences working as an emergency physician in Stockholm, Sweden during the COVID pandemic. For those who are unaware, Sweden never went into full lockdown. Instead, the country imposed a partial lockdown that was almost entirely voluntary. People with office jobs were recommended to work from home, and people, in general, were recommended to avoid public transport unless necessary. Those who were over seventy years old, or who had serious underlying conditions, were recommended to limit social contacts.
The only forcible restriction imposed by the government from the start was a requirement that people do not gather in groups of more than fifty at a time. After it became clear that COVID was above all dangerous to people in nursing homes, an additional restriction was placed on nursing home visits.
At no time has there been any requirement for people to wear face masks in public. Restaurants, cafés, hairdressers, and shops have stayed open throughout the pandemic. Pre-schools and schools for children up to the age of sixteen have stayed open, while schools for children ages sixteen to nineteen switched to distance learning.
My personal experience is that people followed the voluntary restrictions pretty well at the beginning, but that they have become increasingly lax as time has gone on. As a personal example, my mother and my parents-in-law stayed locked up in their homes for the first six weeks or so of the pandemic. After that, they couldn’t bear to be away from their grandchildren any longer.
In my earlier article in August, I mentioned that after an initial peak that lasted for a month or so, from March to April, visits to the Emergency Room due to COVID had been declining continuously, and deaths in Sweden had dropped from over one hundred a day at the peak in April, to around five per day in August.
At the point in August when I wrote that article, I hadn’t seen a single COVID patient in over a month. I speculated that Sweden had developed herd immunity since the huge and continuous drop was happening in spite of the fact that Sweden wasn’t really taking any serious measures to prevent the spread of the infection.
So, how have things developed in the six weeks since that first article?
Well, as things stand now, I haven’t seen a single COVID patient in the Emergency Room in over two and a half months. People have continued to become ever more relaxed in their behaviour, which is noticeable in increasing volumes in the Emergency Room. At the peak of the pandemic in April, I was seeing about half as many patients per shift as usual, probably because lots of people were afraid to go the ER for fear of catching COVID. Now volumes are back to normal.
When I sit in the tube on the way to and from work, it is packed with people. Maybe one in a hundred people is choosing to wear a face mask in public. In Stockholm, life is largely back to normal. If you look at the front pages of the tabloids, on many days there isn’t a single mention of COVID anywhere. As I write this (19th September 2020) the front pages of the two main tabloids have big spreads about arthritis and pensions. Apparently, arthritis and pensions are currently more exciting than COVID-19 in Sweden.
In spite of this relaxed attitude, the death rate has continued to drop. When I wrote the first article, I wrote that COVID had killed under 6,000 people. How many people have died now, six weeks later? Actually, we’re still at under 6,000 deaths. On average, one to two people per day are dying of COVID in Sweden at present, and that number continues to drop.
In the hospital where I work, there isn’t a single person currently being treated for COVID. In fact, in the whole of Stockholm, a county with very nearly two and a half million inhabitants, there are currently only twenty-eight people being treated for COVID in all the hospitals combined. At the peak, in April, that number was over a thousand. If twenty-eight people are currently in hospital, out of two and a half million who live in Stockholm. Which means the odds of having a case of COVID so severe that it requires in-hospital treatment are, at the moment, about one in eighty-six thousand.
Since March, the Emergency Room where I work has been divided into a “COVID” section and a “non-COVID” section. Anyone with a fever, cough, or sore throat has ended up in the COVID section, and we’ve been required to wear full personal protective equipment when interacting with patients in that section. Last Wednesday the hospital shut down the COVID section. So, few true cases of COVID are coming through the Emergency Room that it no longer makes sense to have a separate section for COVID.
What about the few formal restrictions that were imposed early in the pandemic?
The restriction on visits to nursing homes is going to be lifted from October 1st. The older children, ages sixteen to nineteen, who were engaging in distance learning during part of the spring, are now back in school, seeing each other and their teachers face to face. The Swedish public health authority has recommended that the government lift the restriction on gatherings from fifty people to five hundred people.
When I wrote my first article, I engaged in speculation that the reason Sweden seemed to be developing herd immunity, in spite of the fact that only a minority had antibodies, was due to T-cells. Since I wrote that article, studies have appeared which support that argument.
This is good because T-cells tend to last longer than antibodies. In fact, studies of people who were infected with SARS-CoV-1 back in 2003 have found that they still have T-cells seventeen years after being infected. This suggests that immunity is long-lasting, and probably explains why there have only been a handful of reported cases of re-infection with COVID, even though the virus has spent the last nine months bouncing around the planet infecting many millions of people.
As to the handful of people who have been reported to have been re-infected. Almost all those cases have been completely asymptomatic. That is not a sign of waning immunity, as some claim. In fact, it is the opposite. It shows that people develop a functioning immunity after the first infection, which allows them to fight off the second infection without ever developing any symptoms.
So, if Sweden already has herd immunity, what about other countries? How close are they to herd immunity? The places that have experienced a lot of COVID infections, like England and Italy, have mortality curves that are very similar to Sweden’s, in spite of the fact that they went into lockdown. My interpretation is that they went into lockdown too late for it to have any noticeable impact on the spread of the disease. If that is the case, then they have likely also developed herd immunity by now. Which would make the ongoing lockdowns in those countries bizarre.
What about the vaccine? Will it arrive in time to make a difference? As I mentioned in my first article, lockdown only makes sense if you are willing to stay in lockdown until there is an effective vaccine. Otherwise, you are merely postponing the inevitable. At the earliest, a vaccine will be widely available at some point in the middle of next year.
How many governments are willing to keep their populations in lockdown until then? And what if the vaccine is only thirty per-cent effective? Or fifty per-cent? Will governments decide that is good enough for them to end lockdown? Or will they want to stay in lockdown until there is a vaccine that is at least ninety per-cent effective? How many years will that take?
So, to conclude: COVID is over in Sweden. We have herd immunity. Most likely, many other parts of the world do too, including England, Italy, and parts of the US, like New York. And the countries that have successfully contained the spread of the disease, like Germany, Denmark, New Zealand, and Australia, are going to have to stay in lockdown for at least another year, and possibly several years if they don’t want to develop herd immunity the natural way.
Growing concern about Lockdown from doctors in Belgium
19th September 2020
In order to make you aware that there are a growing number of doctors in Europe who feel that Lockdown has been an unmitigated disaster, I have downloaded an open Letter from doctors in Belgium. It can be seen here. https://docs4opendebate.be/en/open-letter/
Doctors in other countries e.g. Germany have done much the same thing. I am putting this on my blog so that as many people as possible read it.
Open letter from medical doctors and health professionals to all Belgian authorities and all Belgian media.
We, Belgian doctors and health professionals wish to express our serious concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts are represented without any form of censorship. After the initial panic surrounding COVID-19, the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore.
The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.
We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties.
‘A cure must not be worse than the problem’ is a thesis that is more relevant than ever in the current situation. We note, however, that the collateral damage now being caused to the population will have a greater impact in the short and long term on all sections of the population than the number of people now being safeguarded from the corona.
In our opinion, the current corona measures and the strict penalties for non-compliance with them are contrary to the values formulated by the Belgian Supreme Health Council, which, until recently, as the health authority, has always ensured quality medicine in our country: “Science – Expertise – Quality – Impartiality – Independence – Transparency”. 1
We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures that are not sufficiently scientifically based, unilaterally directed, and that there is not enough space in the media for an open debate in which different views and opinions are heard. In addition, each municipality and province now has the authorisation to add its own measures, whether well-founded or not.
Moreover, the strict repressive policy on corona strongly contrasts with the government’s minimal policy when it comes to disease prevention, strengthening our own immune system through a healthy lifestyle, optimal care with attention for the individual and investment in care personnel.2
The concept of health
In 1948, the WHO defined health as follows: ‘Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or other physical impairment’.3
Health, therefore, is a broad concept that goes beyond the physical and also relates to the emotional and social well-being of the individual. Belgium also has a duty, from the point of view of subscribing to fundamental human rights, to include these human rights in its decision-making when it comes to measures taken in the context of public health. 4
The current global measures taken to combat SARS-CoV-2 violate to a large extent this view of health and human rights. Measures include compulsory wearing of a mask (also in the open air and during sporting activities, and in some municipalities even when there are no other people in the vicinity), physical distancing, social isolation, compulsory quarantine for some groups and hygiene measures.
The predicted pandemic with millions of deaths
At the beginning of the pandemic, the measures were understandable and widely supported, even if there were differences in implementation in the countries around us. The WHO originally predicted a pandemic that would claim 3.4% victims, in other words, millions of deaths, and a highly contagious virus for which no treatment or vaccine was available. This would put unprecedented pressure on the intensive care units (ICUs) of our hospitals.
This led to a global alarm situation, never seen in the history of mankind: “flatten the curve” was represented by a lockdown that shut down the entire society and economy and quarantined healthy people. Social distancing became the new normal in anticipation of a rescue vaccine.
The facts about COVID-19
Gradually, the alarm bell was sounded from many sources: the objective facts showed a completely different reality. 5 6
The course of COVID-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a flu season. As every year, we see a mix of flu viruses following the curve: first the rhinoviruses, then the influenza A and B viruses, followed by the coronaviruses. There is nothing different from what we normally see.
The use of the non-specific PCR test, which produces many false positives, showed an exponential picture. This test was rushed through with an emergency procedure and was never seriously self-tested. The creator expressly warned that this test was intended for research and not for diagnostics.7
The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of the genome is amplified each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old virus genomes) can possibly result in false positives.8
The test does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample. A real viral infection means a massive presence of viruses, the so-called virus load. If someone tests positive, this does not mean that that person is actually clinically infected, is ill or is going to become ill. Koch’s postulate was not fulfilled (“The pure agent found in a patient with complaints can provoke the same complaints in a healthy person”).
Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate active infection or infectivity, this does not justify the social measures taken which are based solely on these tests. 9 10
Lockdown.
If we compare the waves of infection in countries with strict lockdown policies to countries that did not impose lockdowns (Sweden, Iceland …), we see similar curves. So there is no link between the imposed lockdown and the course of the infection. Lockdown has not led to a lower mortality rate.
If we look at the date of application of the imposed lockdowns we see that the lockdowns were set after the peak was already over and the number of cases decreasing. The drop was therefore not the result of the taken measures. 11
As every year, it seems that climatic conditions (weather, temperature and humidity) and growing immunity are more likely to reduce the wave of infection.
Our immune system
For thousands of years, the human body has been exposed daily to moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi).
The penetration of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced defence mechanism – the immune system. A strong immune system relies on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences. Overly hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity. 12 13 Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distancing.
Influenza will re-emerge in the autumn (in combination with COVID-19) and a possible decrease in natural resilience may lead to further casualties.
Our immune system consists of two parts: a congenital, non-specific immune system and an adaptive immune system.
The non-specific immune system forms a first barrier: skin, saliva, gastric juice, intestinal mucus, vibratory hair cells, commensal flora, … and prevents the attachment of micro-organisms to tissue.
If they do attach, macrophages can cause the microorganisms to be encapsulated and destroyed.
The adaptive immune system consists of mucosal immunity (IgA antibodies, mainly produced by cells in the intestines and lung epithelium), cellular immunity (T-cell activation), which can be generated in contact with foreign substances or microorganisms, and humoral immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the B cells).
Recent research shows that both systems are highly entangled.
It appears that most people already have a congenital or general immunity to e.g. influenza and other viruses. This is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was quarantined because of a few passengers who died of Covid-19. Most of the passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission on the ship. However, 75% did not appear to be infected. So even in this high-risk group, the majority are resistant to the virus.
A study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralise the coronavirus by mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T-cells) while experiencing few or no symptoms 14.
Researchers found up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4+T cells in a non-infected population, suggesting cross-reactivity with another cold (corona) viruses.15 Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus.
The antibody formation (IgM and IgG) by B-cells only occupies a relatively small part of our immune system. This may explain why, with an antibody percentage of 5-10%, there may be a group immunity anyway. The efficacy of vaccines is assessed precisely on the basis of whether or not we have these antibodies. This is a misrepresentation.
Most people who test positive (PCR) have no complaints. Their immune system is strong enough. Strengthening natural immunity is a much more logical approach. Prevention is an important, insufficiently highlighted pillar: healthy, full-fledged nutrition, an exercise in the fresh air, without a mask, stress reduction and nourishing emotional and social contacts.
Consequences of social isolation on physical and mental health
Social isolation and economic damage led to an increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse.16
Studies have shown that the more social and emotional commitments people have, the more resistant they are to viruses. It is much more likely that isolation and quarantine have fatal consequences. 17
The isolation measures have also led to physical inactivity in many older people due to their being forced to stay indoors. However, sufficient exercise has a positive effect on cognitive functioning, reducing depressive complaints and anxiety and improving physical health, energy levels, well-being and, in general, quality of life.18
Fear, persistent stress and loneliness induced by social distancing have a proven negative influence on psychological and general health. 19
A highly contagious virus with millions of deaths without any treatment?
Mortality turned out to be many times lower than expected and close to that of normal seasonal flu (0.2%). 20
The number of registered corona deaths therefore still seems to be overestimated.
There is a difference between death by corona and death with corona. Humans are often carriers of multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria at the same time. Taking into account the fact that most people who developed serious symptoms suffered from additional pathology, one cannot simply conclude that the corona-infection was the cause of death. This was mostly not taken into account in the statistics.
The most vulnerable groups can be clearly identified. The vast majority of deceased patients were 80 years of age or older. The majority (70%) of the deceased, younger than 70 years, had an underlying disorder, such as cardiovascular suffering, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease or obesity. The vast majority of infected persons (>98%) did not or hardly became ill or recovered spontaneously.
Meanwhile, there is an affordable, safe and efficient therapy available for those who do show severe symptoms of disease in the form of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine), zinc and AZT (azithromycin). Rapidly applied this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents hospitalisation. Hardly anyone has to die now.
This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field with impressive results. This contrasts sharply with the theoretical criticism (insufficient substantiation by double-blind studies) which in some countries (e.g. the Netherlands) has even led to a ban on this therapy. A meta-analysis in The Lancet, which could not demonstrate an effect of HCQ, was withdrawn. The primary data sources used proved to be unreliable and 2 out of 3 authors were in conflict of interest. However, most of the guidelines based on this study remained unchanged … 48 49
We have serious questions about this state of affairs.
In the US, a group of doctors in the field, who see patients on a daily basis, united in “America’s Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference which has been watched millions of times.21 51
French Prof Didier Raoult of the Institut d’Infectiologie de Marseille (IHU) also presented this promising combination therapy as early as April. Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured many patients in his practice with HCQ and zinc, called on colleagues in a petition for freedom of therapy.22
The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.23
From the distressing media images of ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) where people were suffocating and given artificial respiration in agony, we now know that this was caused by an exaggerated immune response with intravascular coagulation in the pulmonary blood vessels. The administration of blood thinners and dexamethasone and the avoidance of artificial ventilation, which was found to cause additional damage to lung tissue, means that this dreaded complication, too, is virtually not fatal anymore. 47
It is therefore not a killer virus, but a well-treatable condition.
Propagation
Spreading occurs by drip infection (only for patients who cough or sneeze) and aerosols in closed, unventilated rooms. Contamination is therefore not possible in the open air. Contact tracing and epidemiological studies show that healthy people (or positively tested asymptomatic carriers) are virtually unable to transmit the virus. Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk. 24 25
Transfer via objects (e.g. money, shopping or shopping trolleys) has not been scientifically proven.26 27 28
All this seriously calls into question the whole policy of social distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people – there is no scientific basis for this.
Masks
Oral masks belong in contexts of contacts with proven at-risk groups or people with upper respiratory complaints take place and in a medical context/hospital-retirement home setting. They reduce the risk of droplet infection by sneezing or coughing. Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections. 29 30 31
Wearing a mask is not without side effects. 32 33 Oxygen deficiency (headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs fairly quickly, an effect similar to altitude sickness. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, respiratory problems and hyperventilation due to wearing masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to toxic acidification of the organism which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of increased transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.34
Our Labour Code (Codex 6) refers to a CO2 content (ventilation in workplaces) of 900 ppm, maximum 1200 ppm in special circumstances. After wearing a mask for one minute, this toxic limit is considerably exceeded to values that are three to four times higher than these maximum values. Anyone who wears a mask is therefore in an extreme poorly ventilated room. 35
Inappropriate use of masks without a comprehensive medical cardio-pulmonary test file is therefore not recommended by recognised safety specialists for workers.
Hospitals have a sterile environment in their operating rooms where staff wear masks and there is precise regulation of humidity/temperature with appropriately monitored oxygen flow to compensate for this, thus meeting strict safety standards. 36
A second corona wave?
A second wave is now being discussed in Belgium, with a further tightening of the measures as a result. However, a closer examination of Sciensano’s figures (latest report of 3 September 2020)37 shows that, although there has been an increase in the number of infections since mid-July, there was no increase in hospital admissions or deaths at that time. It is therefore not a second wave of the corona, but a so-called “case chemistry” due to an increased number of tests. 50
The number of hospital admissions or deaths showed a short-lasting minimal increase in recent weeks, but in interpreting it, we must take into account the recent heatwave. In addition, the vast majority of the victims are still in the population group >75 years.
This indicates that the proportion of the measures taken in relation to the working population and young people is disproportionate to the intended objectives.
The vast majority of the positively tested “infected” persons are in the age group of the active population, which does not develop any or merely limited symptoms, due to a well-functioning immune system.
So nothing has changed – the peak is over.
Strengthening a prevention policy
The corona measures form a striking contrast to the minimal policy pursued by the government until now when it comes to well-founded measures with proven health benefits such as the sugar tax, the ban on (e-)cigarettes and making healthy food, exercise and social support networks financially attractive and widely accessible. It is a missed opportunity for a better prevention policy that could have brought about a change in mentality in all sections of the population with clear results in terms of public health. At present, only 3% of the health care budget goes to prevention. 2
The Hippocratic Oath
As a doctor, we took the Hippocratic Oath:
“I will above all care for my patients, promote their health and alleviate their suffering”.
“I will inform my patients correctly.”
“Even under pressure, I will not use my medical knowledge for practices that are against humanity.”
The current measures force us to act against this oath.
Other health professionals have a similar code.
The ‘primum non-nocere’, which every doctor and health professional assumes, is also undermined by the current measures and by the prospect of the possible introduction of a generalised vaccine, which is not subject to extensive prior testing.
Vaccine
Survey studies on influenza vaccinations show that in 10 years we have only succeeded three times in developing a vaccine with an efficiency rate of more than 50%. Vaccinating our elderly appears to be inefficient. Over 75 years of age, the efficacy is almost non-existent.38
Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as we also see every year in the case of the influenza virus, a vaccine is at most a temporary solution, which requires new vaccines each time afterwards. An untested vaccine, which is implemented by emergency procedure and for which the manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm, raises serious questions. 39 40 We do not wish to use our patients as guinea pigs.
On a global scale, 700 000 cases of damage or death are expected as a result of the vaccine.41 If 95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free, the risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible.
The role of the media and the official communication plan
Over the past few months, newspaper, radio and TV makers seemed to stand almost uncritically behind the panel of experts and the government, there, where it is precisely the press that should be critical and prevent one-sided governmental communication. This has led to public communication in our news media, that was more like propaganda than objective reporting.
In our opinion, it is the task of journalism to bring news as objectively and neutrally as possible, aimed at finding the truth and critically controlling power, with dissenting experts also being given a forum in which to express themselves.
This view is supported by the journalistic codes of ethics.42
The official story that a lockdown was necessary, that this was the only possible solution, and that everyone stood behind this lockdown, made it difficult for people with a different view, as well as experts, to express a different opinion.
Alternative opinions were ignored or ridiculed. We have not seen open debates in the media, where different views could be expressed.
We were also surprised by the many videos and articles by many scientific experts and authorities, which were and are still being removed from social media. We feel that this does not fit in with a free, democratic constitutional state, all the more so as it leads to tunnel vision. This policy also has a paralysing effect and feeds fear and concern in society. In this context, we reject the intention of censorship of dissidents in the European Union! 43
The way in which Covid-19 has been portrayed by politicians and the media has not done the situation any good either. War terms were popular and warlike language was not lacking. There has often been mention of a ‘war’ with an ‘invisible enemy’ who has to be ‘defeated’. The use in the media of phrases such as ‘care heroes in the front line’ and ‘corona victims’ has further fuelled fear, as has the idea that we are globally dealing with a ‘killer virus’.
The relentless bombardment with figures, that were unleashed on the population day after day, hour after hour, without interpreting those figures, without comparing them to flu deaths in other years, without comparing them to deaths from other causes, has induced a real psychosis of fear in the population. This is not information, this is manipulation.
We deplore the role of the WHO in this, which has called for the infodemic (i.e. all divergent opinions from the official discourse, including by experts with different views) to be silenced by an unprecedented media censorship.43 44
We urgently call on the media to take their responsibilities here!
We demand an open debate in which all experts are heard.
Emergency law versus Human Rights
The general principle of good governance calls for the proportionality of government decisions to be weighed up in the light of the Higher Legal Standards: any interference by the government must comply with the fundamental rights as protected in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Interference by public authorities is only permitted in crisis situations. In other words, discretionary decisions must be proportionate to an absolute necessity.
The measures that are currently taken concern interference in the exercise of, among other things, the right to respect of private and family life, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly and association, the right to education, etc., and must therefore comply with fundamental rights as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
For example, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the ECHR, interference with the right to private and family life is permissible only if the measures are necessary in the interests of national security, public safety, the economic well-being of the country, the protection of public order and the prevention of criminal offences, the protection of health or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the regulatory text on which the interference is based must be sufficiently clear, foreseeable and proportionate to the objectives pursued.45
The predicted pandemic of millions of deaths seemed to respond to these crisis conditions, leading to the establishment of an emergency government. Now that the objective facts show something completely different, the condition of inability to act otherwise (no time to evaluate thoroughly if there is an emergency) is no longer in place. Covid-19 is not a cold virus, but a well treatable condition with a mortality rate comparable to the seasonal flu. In other words, there is no longer an insurmountable obstacle to public health.
There is no state of emergency.
Immense damage caused by the current policies
An open discussion on corona measures means that, in addition to the years of life gained by corona patients, we must also take into account other factors affecting the health of the entire population. These include damage in the psychosocial domain (increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse)16 and economic damage.
If we take this collateral damage into account, the current policy is out of all proportion, the proverbial use of a sledgehammer to crack a nut. We find it shocking that the government is invoking health as a reason for the emergency law.
As doctors and health professionals, in the face of a virus which, in terms of its harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility, approaches seasonal influenza, we can only reject these extremely disproportionate measures.
We, therefore, demand an immediate end to all measures.
We are questioning the legitimacy of the current advisory experts, who meet behind closed doors.
Following on from ACU 2020 46 https://acu2020.org/nederlandse-versie/ we call for an in-depth examination of the role of the WHO and the possible influence of conflicts of interest in this organisation. It was also at the heart of the fight against the “infodemic”, i.e. the systematic censorship of all dissenting opinions in the media. This is unacceptable for a democratic state governed by the rule of law.43
Distribution of this letter
We would like to make a public appeal to our professional associations and fellow carers to give their opinion on the current measures. We draw attention to and call for an open discussion in which carers can and dare to speak out.
With this open letter, we send out the signal that progress on the same footing does more harm than good and call on politicians to inform themselves independently and critically about the available evidence – including that from experts with different views, as long as it is based on sound science – when rolling out a policy, with the aim of promoting optimum health.
With concern, hope and in a personal capacity.
1: https://www.health.belgium.be/nl/wie-zijn-we#Missie standaard.be/preventie
2: https://www.who.int/about/who-we-are/constitution
3: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health
4: https://swprs.org/feiten-over-covid19/
5: https://the-iceberg.net/
6: https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-multiplex-rt-qpcr-kit-277854-457.htm
7: President John Magufuli of Tanzania: “Even Papaya and Goats are Corona positive” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=207HuOxltvI
8: Open letter by biochemist Drs Mario Ortiz Martinez to the Dutch chamber https://www.gentechvrij.nl/2020/08/15/foute-interpretatie/
9: Interview with Drs Mario Ortiz Martinez https://troo.tube/videos/watch/6ed900eb-7459-4a1b-93fd-b393069f4fcd?fbclid=IwAR1XrullC2qopJjgFxEgbSTBvh-4ZCuJa1VxkHTXEtYMEyGG3DsNwUdaatY
10: https://infekt.ch/2020/04/sind-wir-tatsaechlich-im-blindflug/
11: Lambrecht, B., Hammad, H. The immunology of the allergy epidemic and the hygiene hypothesis. Nat Immunol 18, 1076–1083 (2017). https://www.nature.com/articles/ni.3829
12: Sharvan Sehrawat, Barry T. Rouse, Does the hygiene hypothesis apply to COVID-19 susceptibility?, Microbes and Infection, 2020, ISSN 1286-4579, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.07.002
13: https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)30610-3?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867420306103%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
14: https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2020-08-11/9-manieren-om-corona-te-voorkomen/
15: Feys, F., Brokken, S., & De Peuter, S. (2020, May 22). Risk-benefit and cost-utility analysis for COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium: the impact on mental health and wellbeing. https://psyarxiv.com/xczb3/
16: Kompanje, 2020
17: Conn, Hafdahl en Brown, 2009; Martinsen 2008; Yau, 2008
18: https://brandbriefggz.nl/
19: https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/#overall-mortality
20: https://www.xandernieuws.net/algemeen/groep-artsen-vs-komt-in-verzet-facebook-bant-hun-17-miljoen-keer-bekeken-video/
21: https://www.petities.com/einde_corona_crises_overheid_sta_behandeling_van_covid-19_met_hcq_en_zink_toe
22: https://zelfzorgcovid19.nl/statistieken-zwitserland-met-hcq-zonder-hcq-met-hcq-leveren-het-bewijs/
23: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html
24: http://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/corona-virus/transmission-of-covid-19-by-asymptomatic-cases.html
25: WHO https://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-we-did-not-say-that-cash-was-transmitting-coronavirus-2020-03-06
26: https://www.nordkurier.de/ratgeber/es-gibt-keine-gefahr-jemandem-beim-einkaufen-zu-infizieren-0238940804.html
27: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-germany-banknotes/banknotes-carry-no-particular-coronavirus-risk-german-disease-expert-idUSKBN20Y2ZT
Contradictory statements by our virologists https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K9xfmkMsvM
30: https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2020-07-05/stop-met-anderhalve-meter-afstand-en-het-verplicht-dragen-van-mondkapjes/
31: Security expert Tammy K. Herrema Clark https://youtu.be/TgDm_maAglM
32: https://theplantstrongclub.org/2020/07/04/healthy-people-should-not-wear-face-masks-by-jim-meehan-md/
33: https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/
34: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200315/Reusing-masks-may-increase-your-risk-of-coronavirus-infection-expert-says.aspx
35: https://werk.belgie.be/nl/nieuws/nieuwe-regels-voor-de-kwaliteit-van-de-binnenlucht-werklokalen
36: https://kavlaanderen.blogspot.com/2020/07/als-maskers-niet-werken-waarom-dragen.html
37: https://covid-19.sciensano.be/sites/default/files/Covid19/Meest%20recente%20update.pdf
38: Haralambieva, I.H. et al., 2015. The impact of immunosenescence on humoral immune response variation after influenza A/H1N1 vaccination in older subjects. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26044074/
39: Global vaccine safety summit WHO 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXXDLGKmPg
40: No liability manufacturers vaccines https://m.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20200804_95956456?fbclid=IwAR0IgiA-6sNVQvE8rMC6O5Gq5xhOulbcN1BhdI7Rw-7eq_pRtJDCxde6SQI
41: https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1572921830018/bill-gates-admits-700000-people-will-be-harmed-or-killed-by-his-covid-19-solution
42: Journalistic code https://www.rvdj.be/node/63
43: Disinformation related to COVID-19 approaches European Commission EurLex, Juni 2020 (this file will not damage your computer)
44: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30461-X/full text
45: http://www.raadvst-consetat.be/dbx/adviezen/67142.pdf#search=67.142
46: https://acu2020.org/
47: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0049384820303297?token=9718E5413AACDE0D14A3A0A56A89A3EF744B5A201097F4459AE565EA5EDB222803FF46D7C6CD3419652A215FDD2C874F
48: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext
49 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext
There is no revival of the pandemic, but a so-called casedemic due to more testing.
50: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/crucial-viewing-understanding-covid-19-casedemic1
51: https://docs4opendebate.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/white-paper-on-hcq-from-AFD.pdf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
